Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractIncreased oxidative stress in younger as well as in older humans    Next AbstractIncreased breath biomarkers of oxidative stress in diabetes mellitus »

J Heart Lung Transplant


Title:Heart allograft rejection: detection with breath alkanes in low levels (the HARDBALL study)
Author(s):Phillips M; Boehmer JP; Cataneo RN; Cheema T; Eisen HJ; Fallon JT; Fisher PE; Gass A; Greenberg J; Kobashigawa J; Mancini D; Rayburn B; Zucker MJ;
Address:"Menssana Research, Inc. Fort Lee, New Jersey, USA. menssana@bellatlantic.net"
Journal Title:J Heart Lung Transplant
Year:2004
Volume:23
Issue:6
Page Number:701 - 708
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.07.017
ISSN/ISBN:1053-2498 (Print) 1053-2498 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: We evaluated a new marker of heart transplant rejection, the breath methylated alkane contour (BMAC). Rejection is accompanied by oxidative stress that degrades membrane polyunsaturated fatty acids, evolving alkanes and methylalkanes, which are excreted in the breath as volatile organic compounds (VOCs). METHODS: Breath VOC samples (n = 1,061) were collected from 539 heart transplant recipients before scheduled endomyocardial biopsy. Breath VOCs were analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy, and BMAC was derived from the abundance of C4-C20 alkanes and monomethylalkanes. The 'gold standard' of rejection was the concordant set of International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grades in biopsies read by 2 reviewers. RESULTS: Concordant biopsies were: Grade 0, 645 of 1,061 (60.8%); 1A, 197 (18.6%); 1B, 84 (7.9%); 2, 93 (8.8%); and 3A, 42 (4.0%). A combination of 9 VOCs in the BMAC identified Grade 3 rejection (sensitivity 78.6%, specificity 62.4%, cross-validated sensitivity 59.5%, cross-validated specificity 58.8%, positive predictive value 5.6%, negative predictive value 97.2%). Site pathologists identified the same cases with sensitivity of 42.4%, specificity 97.0%, positive predictive value 45.2% and negative predictive value 96.7%. CONCLUSIONS: A breath test for markers of oxidative stress was more sensitive and less specific for Grade 3 heart transplant rejection than a biopsy reading by a site pathologist, but the negative predictive values of the 2 tests were similar. A screening breath test could potentially identify transplant recipients at low risk of Grade 3 rejection and reduce the number of endomyocardial biopsies"
Keywords:Adult Aged Alkanes/*metabolism Biomarkers/metabolism Breath Tests Case-Control Studies Female Graft Rejection/*metabolism/pathology *Heart Transplantation Humans Male Middle Aged Oxidative Stress/physiology Pulmonary Alveoli/*metabolism Sensitivity and Sp;
Notes:"MedlinePhillips, Michael Boehmer, John P Cataneo, Renee N Cheema, Taseer Eisen, Howard J Fallon, John T Fisher, Peter E Gass, Alan Greenberg, Joel Kobashigawa, Jon Mancini, Donna Rayburn, Barry Zucker, Mark J eng 2R44HL59715/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/ Multicenter Study Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. 2004/09/16 J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004 Jun; 23(6):701-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.07.017"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 23-09-2024