Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAmmonia Released by Streptomyces aburaviensis Induces Droplet Formation in Streptomyces violaceoruber    Next AbstractJasmonic acid does not mediate root growth responses to wounding in Arabidopsis thaliana »

Plant Cell Environ


Title:Local and systemic effects of two herbivores with different feeding mechanisms on primary metabolism of cotton leaves
Author(s):Schmidt L; Schurr U; Rose US;
Address:"Institut Phytosphare (ICG-3), Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH, Julich, Germany"
Journal Title:Plant Cell Environ
Year:2009
Volume:20090303
Issue:7
Page Number:893 - 903
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01969.x
ISSN/ISBN:1365-3040 (Electronic) 0140-7791 (Linking)
Abstract:"Caterpillars and spider mites are herbivores with different feeding mechanisms. Spider mites feed on the cell content via stylets, while caterpillars, as chewing herbivores, remove larger amounts of photosynthetically active tissue. We investigated local and systemic effects of short-term caterpillar and spider mite herbivory on cotton in terms of primary metabolism and growth processes. After short-term caterpillar feeding, leaf growth and water content were decreased in damaged leaves. The glutamate/glutamine ratio increased and other free amino acids were also affected. In contrast, mild spider mite infestation did not affect leaf growth or amino acid composition, but led to an increase in total nitrogen and sucrose concentrations. Both herbivores induced locally increased dark respiration, suggesting an increased mobilization of storage compounds potentially available for synthesis of defensive substances, but did not affect assimilation and transpiration. Systemically induced leaves were not significantly affected by the treatments performed in this study. The results show that cotton plants do not compensate the loss of photosynthetic tissue with higher photosynthetic efficiency of the remaining tissue. However, early plant responses to different herbivores leave their signature in primary metabolism, affecting leaf growth. Changes in amino acid concentrations, total nitrogen and sucrose content may affect subsequent herbivore performance"
Keywords:Animals Feeding Behavior Glutamic Acid/metabolism Glutamine/metabolism Gossypium/growth & development/*metabolism Larva/physiology Nitrogen/metabolism Photosynthesis Plant Leaves/growth & development/*metabolism Species Specificity Spodoptera/*physiology;
Notes:"MedlineSchmidt, Lilian Schurr, Ulrich Rose, Ursula S R eng 2009/03/24 Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Jul; 32(7):893-903. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01969.x. Epub 2009 Mar 3"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024