Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractInvolvement of the corticoadrenal hormones in the pheromonal restoration of reproductive activity in aging rats    Next AbstractDevelopment of a new and environment friendly hollow fiber-supported liquid phase microextraction using vesicular aggregate-based supramolecular solvent »

Phytochem Anal


Title:"Comparison of headspace solid-phase microextraction, headspace single-drop microextraction and hydrodistillation for chemical screening of volatiles in Myrtus communis L"
Author(s):Moradi M; Kaykhaii M; Ghiasvand AR; Shadabi S; Salehinia A;
Address:"Department of Chemistry, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran"
Journal Title:Phytochem Anal
Year:2012
Volume:20111108
Issue:4
Page Number:379 - 386
DOI: 10.1002/pca.1368
ISSN/ISBN:1099-1565 (Electronic) 0958-0344 (Linking)
Abstract:"INTRODUCTION: Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and headspace single-drop microextraction (HS-SDME) methods have never been used for the extraction and analysis of the volatile compounds of Myrtus communis. For that reason, in this work, these two techniques were compared with the traditional hydrodistillation (HD) extraction technique. OBJECTIVE: To compare SPME and SDME with HD for the extraction and analysis of Myrtus communis volatiles. METHODOLOGY: Three extraction methods, i.e. SPME, SDME and HD, coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry were used and optimised for the analysis of Myrtus communis volatiles. The SPME extraction was performed on a 100 microm PDMS fibre and for SDME a drop of n-octadecane containing 0.7% of menthol as internal standard was used as extracting solvent. The results were compared from different viewpoints including efficiency of extraction, different kinds of species extracted and quantity of extracted compounds with HD. RESULTS: The main analytes extracted by SPME were found to be alpha-pinene, limonene, 1,8-cineole, linalool, linalyl acetate, alpha-terpinyl acetate and geranyl acetate, whereas for SDME alpha-pinene, limonene, 1,8-cineole, linalool, linalyl acetate and beta-myrcene were extracted as major components. Hydrodistillation could extract alpha-pinene, limonene, 1,8-cineole, linalool, alpha-terpineol, linalyl acetate, alpha-terpinyl acetate, geranyl acetate and cis-isoeugenol better than other volatiles from Myrtus communis. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that HS-SPME and HS-SDME can be applied successfully for the extraction and separation of volatiles in aromatic plants, and these techniques are easier to perform, and more effective than HD for collection of more volatile compounds"
Keywords:Acetates/chemistry/isolation & purification Acyclic Monoterpenes Alkanes/chemistry Bicyclic Monoterpenes Cyclohexenes/chemistry/isolation & purification Distillation/*methods Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Limonene Menthol/chemistry Monoterpenes/che;
Notes:"MedlineMoradi, Mohammad Kaykhaii, Massoud Ghiasvand, Ali Reza Shadabi, Shahriar Salehinia, Alinazar eng Comparative Study England 2011/11/10 Phytochem Anal. 2012 Jul-Aug; 23(4):379-86. doi: 10.1002/pca.1368. Epub 2011 Nov 8"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-11-2024