Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMonitoring of food spoilage by high resolution THz analysis    Next AbstractEvolutionary constraints in high-dimensional trait sets »

Genetics


Title:Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix
Author(s):Hine E; Blows MW;
Address:"School of Integrative Biology, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia. ehine@zen.uq.edu.au"
Journal Title:Genetics
Year:2006
Volume:20060317
Issue:2
Page Number:1135 - 1144
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.054627
ISSN/ISBN:0016-6731 (Print) 0016-6731 (Linking)
Abstract:"Determining the dimensionality of G provides an important perspective on the genetic basis of a multivariate suite of traits. Since the introduction of Fisher's geometric model, the number of genetically independent traits underlying a set of functionally related phenotypic traits has been recognized as an important factor influencing the response to selection. Here, we show how the effective dimensionality of G can be established, using a method for the determination of the dimensionality of the effect space from a multivariate general linear model introduced by Amemiya (1985). We compare this approach with two other available methods, factor-analytic modeling and bootstrapping, using a half-sib experiment that estimated G for eight cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila serrata. In our example, eight pheromone traits were shown to be adequately represented by only two underlying genetic dimensions by Amemiya's approach and factor-analytic modeling of the covariance structure at the sire level. In contrast, bootstrapping identified four dimensions with significant genetic variance. A simulation study indicated that while the performance of Amemiya's method was more sensitive to power constraints, it performed as well or better than factor-analytic modeling in correctly identifying the original genetic dimensions at moderate to high levels of heritability. The bootstrap approach consistently overestimated the number of dimensions in all cases and performed less well than Amemiya's method at subspace recovery"
Keywords:"Animals Databases, Genetic Drosophila/genetics *Genetic Variation Linear Models *Models, Genetic Models, Statistical Phenotype;"
Notes:"MedlineHine, Emma Blows, Mark W eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2006/03/21 Genetics. 2006 Jun; 173(2):1135-44. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.054627. Epub 2006 Mar 17"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 18-11-2024