Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractProteases and the processing of precursors to secreted proteins in yeast    Next Abstract"A validated LC-MS/MS method for thyroid hormone determination in sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) plasma, gill, kidney and liver" »

Evolution


Title:"Sexual conflict and cryptic female choice in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus"
Author(s):Bussiere LF; Hunt J; Jennions MD; Brooks R;
Address:"School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia. luc.bussiere@access.unizh.ch"
Journal Title:Evolution
Year:2006
Volume:60
Issue:4
Page Number:792 - 800
DOI:
ISSN/ISBN:0014-3820 (Print) 0014-3820 (Linking)
Abstract:"The prevalence and evolutionary consequences of cryptic female choice (CFC) remain highly controversial, not least because the processes underlying its expression are often concealed within the female reproductive tract. However, even when female discrimination is relatively easy to observe, as in numerous insect species with externally attached spermatophores, it is often difficult to demonstrate directional CFC for certain male phenotypes over others. Using a biological assay to separate male crickets into attractive or unattractive categories, we demonstrate that females strongly discriminate against unattractive males by removing their spermatophores before insemination can be completed. This results in significantly more sperm being transferred by attractive males than unattractive males. Males respond to CFC by mate guarding females after copulation, which increases the spermatophore retention of both attractive and unattractive males. Interestingly, unattractive males who suffered earlier interruption of sperm transfer benefited more from mate guarding, and they guarded females more vigilantly than attractive males. Our results suggest that postcopulatory mate guarding has evolved via sexual conflict over insemination times rather than through genetic benefits of biasing paternity toward vigorous males, as has been previously suggested"
Keywords:"Animals Choice Behavior Evolution, Molecular Female Gryllidae Inbreeding Insemination Male Phenotype Reproduction Selection, Genetic Sex Attractants Sex Characteristics *Sexual Behavior, Animal Spermatozoa/metabolism;"
Notes:"MedlineBussiere, Luc F Hunt, John Jennions, Michael D Brooks, Robert eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2006/06/03 Evolution. 2006 Apr; 60(4):792-800"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024