Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Association of long term exposure to outdoor volatile organic compounds (BTXS) with pro-inflammatory biomarkers and hematologic parameters in urban adults: A cross-sectional study in Tabriz, Iran"    Next AbstractMathematical modeling of cascading migration in a tri-trophic food-chain system »

Chemistry


Title:Differentiating a diverse range of volatile organic compounds with polyfluorophore sensors built on a DNA scaffold
Author(s):Samain F; Dai N; Kool ET;
Address:"Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5080, USA"
Journal Title:Chemistry
Year:2011
Volume:20101210
Issue:1
Page Number:174 - 183
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201002836
ISSN/ISBN:1521-3765 (Electronic) 0947-6539 (Print) 0947-6539 (Linking)
Abstract:"Oligodeoxyfluorosides (ODFs) are short DNA-like oligomers in which DNA bases are replaced with fluorophores. A preliminary study reported that some sequences of ODFs were able to respond to a few organic small molecules in the vapor phase, giving a change in fluorescence. Here, we follow up on this finding by investigating a larger range of volatile organic analytes, and a considerably larger set of sensors. A library of tetramer ODFs of 2401 different sequences was prepared by using combinatorial methods, and was screened in air for fluorescence responses to a set of ten different volatile organics, including multiple aromatic and aliphatic compounds, acids and bases, varied functional groups, and closely related structures. Nineteen responding sensors were selected and characterized. These sensors were cross-screened against all ten analytes, and responses were measured qualitatively (by changes in color and intensity) and quantitatively (by measuring DeltaR, DeltaG, and DeltaB values averaged over five to six sensor beads; R=red, G=green, B=blue). The results show that sensor responses were diverse, with a single sensor responding differently to as many as eight of the ten analytes; multiple classes of responses were seen, including quenching, lighting-up, and varied shifts in wavelength. Responses were strong, with raw DeltaR, DeltaG, and DeltaB values of as high as >200 on a 256-unit scale and unamplified changes in many cases apparent to the naked eye. Sensors were identified that could distinguish clearly between even very closely related compounds such as acrolein and acrylonitrile. Statistical methods were applied to select a small set of four sensors that, as a pattern response, could distinguish between all ten analytes with high confidence. Sequence analysis of the full set of sensors suggested that sequence/order of the monomer components, and not merely composition, was highly important in the responses"
Keywords:DNA/*chemistry Fluorescent Dyes/*chemistry Molecular Structure Oligodeoxyribonucleotides/chemical synthesis/*chemistry Volatile Organic Compounds/*chemistry;
Notes:"MedlineSamain, Florent Dai, Nan Kool, Eric T eng R01 GM067201/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/ R01 GM067201-01/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/ GM067201/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/ Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Germany 2011/01/06 Chemistry. 2011 Jan 3; 17(1):174-83. doi: 10.1002/chem.201002836. Epub 2010 Dec 10"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024