Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractPurification and structural analysis of volatile sesquiterpenes produced by Escherichia coli carrying unidentified terpene synthase genes from edible plants of the family Araliaceae    Next AbstractReproductive strategies in snakes »

Evolution


Title:Reproductive isolating mechanisms between two sympatric sibling species of sea snakes
Author(s):Shine R; Reed RN; Shetty S; Lemaster M; Mason RT;
Address:"School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. rics@bio.usyd.edu.au"
Journal Title:Evolution
Year:2002
Volume:56
Issue:8
Page Number:1655 - 1662
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01477.x
ISSN/ISBN:0014-3820 (Print) 0014-3820 (Linking)
Abstract:"Mechanisms that maintain species isolation within sympatric congeners have attracted analysis in many kinds of organisms, but not in snakes. We studied two sibling species of amphibious sea snakes (Laticauda colubrina and L. frontalis) on the island of Efate, in the Pacific Ocean republic of Vanuatu. The two taxa are almost identical morphologically, except that L. colubrina grows much larger than L. frontalis. No natural hybrids have been reported, and geographic distributions of the two taxa suggest the possibility of sympatric speciation. Our fieldwork shows that the two taxa are often syntopic and overlap in breeding seasons. Behavioral studies in outdoor arenas show that the separation between these two taxa is maintained by species-specific cues that control male courtship. Males of both species courted conspecific females but not heterospecific females. The proximate mechanism driving this separation involves chemical cues. Adult females of both taxa possess distinctive lipids in the skin. Males directed courtship behavior (chin-pressing) to hexane-extracted samples of lipids from conspecific but not heterospecific females. Males of the dwarf species (L frontalis) were more selective courters than were those of the larger taxon (L. colubrina), perhaps because a preference for courting larger females means that L. colubrina males would be unlikely to court L. frontalis-sized (i.e., small) females even in the absence of pheromonal barriers"
Keywords:"Animals Elapidae/classification/genetics/*physiology Female Male Reproduction/*physiology Sexual Behavior, Animal/physiology Species Specificity;"
Notes:"MedlineShine, Richard Reed, Robert N Shetty, Sohan Lemaster, Michael Mason, Robert T eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2002/10/02 Evolution. 2002 Aug; 56(8):1655-62. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01477.x"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-06-2024