Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Measurement of volatile organic compounds in the urban atmosphere of Harris County, Texas, USA"    Next Abstract"Courtship pheromone production and body size as correlates of larval diet in males of the arctiid moth,Utetheisa ornatrix" »

Environ Sci Technol


Title:Occurrence and fate of organic contaminants during onsite wastewater treatment
Author(s):Conn KE; Barber LB; Brown GK; Siegrist RL;
Address:"Environmental Science and Engineering Division, Colorado School of Mines, 206 Coolbaugh Hall, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA"
Journal Title:Environ Sci Technol
Year:2006
Volume:40
Issue:23
Page Number:7358 - 7366
DOI: 10.1021/es0605117
ISSN/ISBN:0013-936X (Print) 0013-936X (Linking)
Abstract:"Onsite wastewater treatment systems serve approximately 25% of the U.S. population. However, little is known regarding the occurrence and fate of organic wastewater contaminants (OWCs), including endocrine disrupting compounds, during onsite treatment. A range of OWCs including surfactant metabolites, steroids, stimulants, metal-chelating agents, disinfectants, antimicrobial agents, and pharmaceutical compounds was quantified in wastewater from 30 onsite treatment systems in Summit and Jefferson Counties, CO. The onsite systems represent a range of residential and nonresidential sources. Eighty eight percent of the 24 target compounds were detected in one or more samples, and several compounds were detected in every wastewater sampled. The wastewater matrices were complex and showed unique differences between source types due to differences in water and consumer product use. Nonresidential sources generally had more OWCs at higher concentrations than residential sources. Additional aerobic biofilter-based treatment beyond the traditional anaerobic tank-based treatment enhanced removal for many OWCs. Removal mechanisms included volatilization, biotransformation, and sorption with efficiencies from <1% to >99% depending on treatment type and physicochemical properties of the compound. Even with high removal rates during confined unit onsite treatment, OWCs are discharged to soil dispersal units at loadings up to 20 mg/m2/d, emphasizing the importance of understanding removal mechanisms and efficiencies in onsite treatment systems that discharge to the soil and water environments"
Keywords:"Chelating Agents/analysis Colorado Disinfectants/analysis Drug Residues/analysis Environmental Monitoring/*statistics & numerical data Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Soil/*analysis Surface-Active Agents/analysis Waste Disposal, Fluid/*methods Water;"
Notes:"MedlineConn, Kathleen E Barber, Larry B Brown, Gregory K Siegrist, Robert L eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 2006/12/22 Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Dec 1; 40(23):7358-66. doi: 10.1021/es0605117"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024