Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCaste differences in venom volatiles and their effect on alarm behaviour in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus (Christ)    Next AbstractChanges in cytokinins are sufficient to alter developmental patterns of defense metabolites in Nicotiana attenuata »

Transl Lung Cancer Res


Title:Breath analysis as a diagnostic and screening tool for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review
Author(s):Brusselmans L; Arnouts L; Millevert C; Vandersnickt J; van Meerbeeck JP; Lamote K;
Address:"Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Paediatrics, Antwerp University, Wilrijk, Belgium. Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Department of Pneumology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium"
Journal Title:Transl Lung Cancer Res
Year:2018
Volume:7
Issue:5
Page Number:520 - 536
DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.04.09
ISSN/ISBN:2218-6751 (Print) 2226-4477 (Electronic) 2218-6751 (Linking)
Abstract:"Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a tumour related to a historical exposure to asbestos fibres. Currently, the definite diagnosis is made only by the histological examination of a biopsy obtained through an invasive thoracoscopy. However, diagnosis is made too late for curative treatment because of non-specific symptoms mainly appearing at advanced stage disease. Hence, due to its biologic aggressiveness and the late diagnosis, survival rate is low and the patients' outcome poor. In addition, radiological imaging, like computed tomographic scans, and blood biomarkers are found not to be sensitive enough to be used as an early diagnostic tool. Detection in an early stage is assumed to improve the patients' outcome but is hampered due to non-specific and late symptomology. Hence, there is a need for a new screening and diagnostic test which could improve the patients' outcome. Despite extensive research has focused on blood biomarkers, not a single has been shown clinically useful, and therefore research recently shifted to 'breathomics' techniques to recognize specific volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the breath of the patient as potential non-invasive biomarkers for disease. In this review, we summarize the acquired knowledge about using breath analysis for diagnosing and monitoring MPM and asbestos-related disorders (ARD). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), the gold standard of breath analysis, appears to be the method with the highest accuracy (97%) to differentiate MPM patients from at risk asbestos-exposed subjects. There have already been found some interesting biomarkers that are significantly elevated in asbestosis (NO, 8-isoprostane, leukotriene B4, alpha-Pinene...) and MPM (cyclohexane) patients. Regrettably, the different techniques and the plethora of studies suffer some limitations. Most studies are pilot studies with the inclusion of a limited number of patients. Nevertheless, given the promising results and easy sampling methods, we can conclude that breath analysis may become a useful tool in the future to screen for MPM, but further research is warranted"
Keywords:Asbestosis biomarkers breath analysis mesothelioma volatile organic compounds (VOCs);
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEBrusselmans, Lisa Arnouts, Lieselot Millevert, Charissa Vandersnickt, Joyce van Meerbeeck, Jan P Lamote, Kevin eng Review China 2018/11/20 Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Oct; 7(5):520-536. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.04.09"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024