Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractVolatility of organic molecular markers used for source apportionment analysis: measurements and implications for atmospheric lifetime    Next AbstractProduction of volatiles in fresh-cut apple: effect of applying alginate coatings containing linoleic acid or isoleucine »

Physiol Behav


Title:Rubbings deposited by cats elicit defensive behavior in rats
Author(s):May MD; Bowen MT; McGregor IS; Timberlake W;
Address:"The Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E. 10th Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States. maymd@umail.iu.edu"
Journal Title:Physiol Behav
Year:2012
Volume:20120310
Issue:5
Page Number:711 - 718
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.03.007
ISSN/ISBN:1873-507X (Electronic) 0031-9384 (Linking)
Abstract:"Laboratory rats display pronounced defensive behaviors when confronted with a range of cat-derived stimuli, including collars worn by a cat, cloths rubbed on a cat, and cat fur. One possible explanation of this phenomenon (the 'kairomone hypothesis') is that rats derive a survival advantage by eavesdropping on signals used by cats to communicate with each other. Cats are known to rub their bodies on objects at strategic environmental locations to signal their identity and mating potential to other cats. The current study assessed the sensitivity of laboratory rats to these body rubbings. In Experiment 1, food deprived Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to consume food pellets in one arm of a Y maze. On test day a damp cloth was placed near the food pellets that had been rubbed on a location (wall) where a cat had recently engaged in body rubbing. A control cloth and a collar worn by the cat were also tested. The presence of both the body rubbing residue and the cat collar increased latency to eat and decreased amount of food eaten. The disruption of consummatory behavior in the test environment was still evident 24h later in the absence of odor stimuli. Experiment 2 tested the reaction of naive Wistar rats to body rubbings using a paradigm in which rats were given the opportunity to hide. Relative to a control condition, rats exposed to a cotton pad wiped on a cat body rubbing location showed increased hiding behavior, decreased exploration and reduced stimulus approach and investigation. These defensive responses persisted for up to 4days following a single stimulus exposure. These results suggest that rats eavesdrop readily on body rubbings cats use for identification purposes, providing further support for a kairomone hypothesis of predator odor avoidance"
Keywords:"Animal Communication Animals Behavior, Animal/*physiology Cats/physiology Female Male Odorants Pheromones/physiology Rats/physiology/*psychology Rats, Sprague-Dawley Rats, Wistar;"
Notes:"MedlineMay, Matthew D Bowen, Michael T McGregor, Iain S Timberlake, William eng 2012/03/22 Physiol Behav. 2012 Dec 5; 107(5):711-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Mar 10"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024