Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractPreliminary Study: Depriving Piglets of Maternal Feces for the First Seven Days Post-Partum Changes Piglet Physiology and Performance before and after Weaning    Next AbstractTranscriptional 'memory' of a stress: transient chromatin and memory (epigenetic) marks at stress-response genes »

J Agric Food Chem


Title:Real-time flavor analysis: optimization of a proton-transfer-mass spectrometer and comparison with an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometer with an MS-nose interface
Author(s):Avison SJ;
Address:"Firmenich S.A., Rue de la Bergere 7, Meyrin 2, CH-1217 Geneva, Switzerland"
Journal Title:J Agric Food Chem
Year:2013
Volume:20130221
Issue:9
Page Number:2070 - 2076
DOI: 10.1021/jf304418y
ISSN/ISBN:1520-5118 (Electronic) 0021-8561 (Linking)
Abstract:"Two techniques are recognized for the real-time analysis of flavors during eating and drinking, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (APCI-MS), and proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS). APCI-MS was developed for the analysis of flavors and fragrances, whereas PTR-MS was originally developed and optimized for the analysis of atmospheric pollutants. Here, the suitability of the two techniques for real-time flavor analysis is compared, using a varied range of common flavor compounds. An Ionicon PTR-MS was first optimized and then its performance critically compared with that of APCI-MS. Performance was gauged using the capacity for soft ionization, dynamic linear range, and limit of detection. Optimization of the PTR-MS increased the average sensitivity by a factor of more than 3. However, even with this increase in sensitivity, the Limit of Detection was typically 10 times higher and the Dynamic Linear Range ten times narrower than that of the APCI-MS"
Keywords:Limit of Detection Mass Spectrometry/*methods Smell *Taste Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis;
Notes:"MedlineAvison, Shane J eng Comparative Study 2013/02/12 J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Mar 6; 61(9):2070-6. doi: 10.1021/jf304418y. Epub 2013 Feb 21"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024