Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCommon household chemicals and the allergy risks in pre-school age children    Next AbstractField evaluation of the bacterial volatile derivative 3-pentanol in priming for induced resistance in pepper »

Environ Res


Title:Non-microbial sources of microbial volatile organic compounds
Author(s):Choi H; Schmidbauer N; Bornehag CG;
Address:"Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, School of Public Health, State University of New York, United States. Electronic address: hchoi@albany.edu. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, PO Box 100, 2027 Kjeller, Norway, Instituttveien 18, 2007 Kjeller, Norway. Electronic address: ns@nilu.no. Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Box 857, SE-501 15 Boras, Sweden; Department of Public Health Sciences, Karlstad University, SE-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden. Electronic address: Carl-Gustaf.Bornehag@kau.se"
Journal Title:Environ Res
Year:2016
Volume:20160401
Issue:
Page Number:127 - 136
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.03.026
ISSN/ISBN:1096-0953 (Electronic) 0013-9351 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: The question regarding the true sources of the purported microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs) remains unanswered. OBJECTIVE: To identify microbial, as well as non-microbial sources of 28 compounds, which are commonly accepted as microbial VOCs (i.e. primary outcome of interest is Sigma 28 VOCs). METHODS: In a cross-sectional investigation of 390 homes, six building inspectors assessed water/mold damage, took air and dust samples, and measured environmental conditions (i.e., absolute humidity (AH, g/m(3)), temperature ( degrees C), ventilation rate (ACH)). The air sample was analyzed for volatile organic compounds (mug/m(3)) and; dust samples were analyzed for total viable fungal concentration (CFU/g) and six phthalates (mg/g dust). Four benchmark variables of the underlying sources were defined as highest quartile categories of: 1) the total concentration of 17 propylene glycol and propylene glycol ethers (Sigma17 PGEs) in the air sample; 2) 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate (TMPD-MIB) in the air sample; 3) semi-quantitative mold index; and 4) total fungal load (CFU/g). RESULTS: Within severely damp homes, co-occurrence of the highest quartile concentration of either Sigma17 PGEs or TMPD-MIB were respectively associated with a significantly higher median concentration of Sigma 28 VOCs (8.05 and 13.38mug/m(3), respectively) compared to the reference homes (4.30 and 4.86mug/m(3), respectively, both Ps
Keywords:"Air Microbiology Air Pollutants/*analysis Air Pollution, Indoor/*analysis Dust/analysis Environmental Monitoring Fungi/*isolation & purification Housing Humidity Phthalic Acids/analysis Temperature Ventilation Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis Allergie;"
Notes:"MedlineChoi, Hyunok Schmidbauer, Norbert Bornehag, Carl-Gustaf eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Netherlands 2016/04/05 Environ Res. 2016 Jul; 148:127-136. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.03.026. Epub 2016 Apr 1"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024