Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractResponses of male rats to odors from familiar vs novel females    Next AbstractSIFT-MS analysis of Iberian hams from pigs reared under different conditions »

PLoS One


Title:Sequence comparisons of odorant receptors among tortricid moths reveal different rates of molecular evolution among family members
Author(s):Carraher C; Authier A; Steinwender B; Newcomb RD;
Address:"The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand"
Journal Title:PLoS One
Year:2012
Volume:20120611
Issue:6
Page Number:e38391 -
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038391
ISSN/ISBN:1932-6203 (Electronic) 1932-6203 (Linking)
Abstract:"In insects, odorant receptors detect volatile cues involved in behaviours such as mate recognition, food location and oviposition. We have investigated the evolution of three odorant receptors from five species within the moth genera Ctenopseustis and Planotrotrix, family Tortricidae, which fall into distinct clades within the odorant receptor multigene family. One receptor is the orthologue of the co-receptor Or83b, now known as Orco (OR2), and encodes the obligate ion channel subunit of the receptor complex. In comparison, the other two receptors, OR1 and OR3, are ligand-binding receptor subunits, activated by volatile compounds produced by plants--methyl salicylate and citral, respectively. Rates of sequence evolution at non-synonymous sites were significantly higher in OR1 compared with OR2 and OR3. Within the dataset OR1 contains 109 variable amino acid positions that are distributed evenly across the entire protein including transmembrane helices, loop regions and termini, while OR2 and OR3 contain 18 and 16 variable sites, respectively. OR2 shows a high level of amino acid conservation as expected due to its essential role in odour detection; however we found unexpected differences in the rate of evolution between two ligand-binding odorant receptors, OR1 and OR3. OR3 shows high sequence conservation suggestive of a conserved role in odour reception, whereas the higher rate of evolution observed in OR1, particularly at non-synonymous sites, may be suggestive of relaxed constraint, perhaps associated with the loss of an ancestral role in sex pheromone reception"
Keywords:"Acyclic Monoterpenes Amino Acid Sequence Animals Base Sequence Cloning, Molecular DNA Primers/genetics *Evolution, Molecular Likelihood Functions Models, Genetic Molecular Sequence Data Monoterpenes/metabolism Moths/*genetics New Zealand *Phylogeny Protei;"
Notes:"MedlineCarraher, Colm Authier, Astrid Steinwender, Bernd Newcomb, Richard D eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2012/06/16 PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e38391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038391. Epub 2012 Jun 11"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024