Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractSulphur supply and infection with Pyrenopeziza brassicae influence L-cysteine desulphydrase activity in Brassica napus L    Next Abstract"Regulation of enzymatic activity involved in sex pheromone production in the housefly, Musca domestica" »

Environ Microbiol


Title:Production of plant growth modulating volatiles is widespread among rhizosphere bacteria and strongly depends on culture conditions
Author(s):Blom D; Fabbri C; Connor EC; Schiestl FP; Klauser DR; Boller T; Eberl L; Weisskopf L;
Address:"Department of Microbiology, Institute of Plant Biology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland"
Journal Title:Environ Microbiol
Year:2011
Volume:20110920
Issue:11
Page Number:3047 - 3058
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02582.x
ISSN/ISBN:1462-2920 (Electronic) 1462-2912 (Linking)
Abstract:"Recent studies have suggested that bacterial volatiles play an important role in bacterial-plant interactions. However, few reports of bacterial species that produce plant growth modulating volatiles have been published, raising the question whether this is just an anecdotal phenomenon. To address this question, we performed a large screen of strains originating from the soil for volatile-mediated effects on Arabidopsis thaliana. All of the 42 strains tested showed significant volatile-mediated plant growth modulation, with effects ranging from plant death to a sixfold increase in plant biomass. The effects of bacterial volatiles were highly dependent on the cultivation medium and the inoculum quantity. GC-MS analysis of the tested strains revealed over 130 bacterial volatile compounds. Indole, 1-hexanol and pentadecane were selected for further studies because they appeared to promote plant growth. None of these compounds triggered a typical defence response, using production of ethylene and of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as read-outs. However, when plants were challenged with the flg-22 epitope of bacterial flagellin, a prototypical elicitor of defence responses, additional exposure to the volatiles reduced the flg-22-induced production of ethylene and ROS in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that bacterial volatiles may act as effectors to inhibit the plant's defence response"
Keywords:Alkanes/chemistry Arabidopsis/drug effects/growth & development/*microbiology Bacteria/*chemistry Culture Media Ethylenes/metabolism Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Hexanols/chemistry Indoles/chemistry Plant Growth Regulators/pharmacology Reactive Ox;
Notes:"MedlineBlom, D Fabbri, C Connor, E C Schiestl, F P Klauser, D R Boller, T Eberl, L Weisskopf, L eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2011/09/22 Environ Microbiol. 2011 Nov; 13(11):3047-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02582.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024