Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractThe allegory of a mountain: an environmental introduction to neurotoxicology    Next AbstractFunctional asymmetry of the two nucleotide binding domains in the ABC transporter Ste6 »

Evolution


Title:The Evolution of Copulation in Water Mites: A Comparative Test for Nonreversing Characters
Author(s):Proctor HC;
Address:"Department of Zoology, Erindale College, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario, L5L 1C6, CANADA"
Journal Title:Evolution
Year:1991
Volume:45
Issue:3
Page Number:558 - 567
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04329.x
ISSN/ISBN:1558-5646 (Electronic) 0014-3820 (Linking)
Abstract:"Although copulation is a widespread behavior with multiple origins, hypotheses about selective forces behind its evolution have not been tested by the comparative method. Because copulation has arisen many times in the water mites (Acari: Parasitengona), they are good subjects for a comparative study of copulation. I determined that copulation evolved 91 times in the 343 extant genera. There was no evidence of reversals to noncopulation; therefore, Ridley's (1983) contingency-table comparative test was not appropriate. I designed a comparative test for instances in which there is no loss of the derived trait of interest. This test determines whether independent evolutions of a trait cooccur with a predictor more often than expected by chance. Two hypotheses were tested: 1) that copulation would be selected for in running-water habitats because of disruption of pheromonal communication; 2) that copulation would be selected for in swimming mites because females are less likely to contact spermatophores deposited on a substrate. Independent evolutions of copulation among running-water mites were not more frequent than expected by chance (P > 0.4), but there were more evolutions of copulation than expected among swimming mites (P < 0.005). Endoparasitism, secondary loss of swimming hairs, production of spermatophore fields, courtship, and benthivorous habits may explain why some mites copulate but do not swim while others swim but do not copulate"
Keywords:Acari Arachnids comparative method mating behavior;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEProctor, Heather C eng 1991/05/01 Evolution. 1991 May; 45(3):558-567. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04329.x"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 28-12-2024