Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCarbonaceous aerosols emitted from light-duty vehicles operating on gasoline and ethanol fuel blends    Next AbstractChanges in lung epithelial cell volatile metabolite profile induced by pro-fibrotic stimulation with TGF-beta1 »

Respir Res


Title:Breath biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review
Author(s):Hayton C; Terrington D; Wilson AM; Chaudhuri N; Leonard C; Fowler SJ;
Address:"Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. conalhayton@doctors.org.uk. North West Lung Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. conalhayton@doctors.org.uk. Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. North West Lung Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK"
Journal Title:Respir Res
Year:2019
Volume:20190111
Issue:1
Page Number:7 -
DOI: 10.1186/s12931-019-0971-8
ISSN/ISBN:1465-993X (Electronic) 1465-9921 (Print) 1465-9921 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Exhaled biomarkers may be related to disease processes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) however their clinical role remains unclear. We performed a systematic review to investigate whether breath biomarkers discriminate between patients with IPF and healthy controls. We also assessed correlation with lung function, ability to distinguish diagnostic subgroups and change in response to treatment. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched. Study selection was limited to adults with a diagnosis of IPF as per international guidelines. RESULTS: Of 1014 studies screened, fourteen fulfilled selection criteria and included 257 IPF patients. Twenty individual biomarkers discriminated between IPF and controls and four showed correlation with lung function. Meta-analysis of three studies indicated mean (+/- SD) alveolar nitric oxide (C(alv)NO) levels were significantly higher in IPF (8.5 +/- 5.5 ppb) than controls (4.4 +/- 2.2 ppb). Markers of oxidative stress in exhaled breath condensate, such as hydrogen peroxide and 8-isoprostane, were also discriminatory. Two breathomic studies have isolated discriminative compounds using mass spectrometry. There was a lack of studies assessing relevant treatment and none assessed differences in diagnostic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests C(alv)NO is higher in IPF, although studies were limited by small sample size. Further breathomic work may identify biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic potential"
Keywords:Biomarkers/metabolism Breath Tests/methods Humans Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/*diagnosis/*metabolism Inflammation Mediators/metabolism Nitric Oxide/metabolism Oxidative Stress/*physiology Respiratory Mechanics/*physiology Breath tests Exhaled breath con;
Notes:"MedlineHayton, Conal Terrington, Dayle Wilson, Andrew M Chaudhuri, Nazia Leonard, Colm Fowler, Stephen J eng Systematic Review England 2019/01/13 Respir Res. 2019 Jan 11; 20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-0971-8"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024