Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractA comparison of the kinetics of plasmid transfer in the conjugation systems encoded by the F plasmid from Escherichia coli and plasmid pCF10 from Enterococcus faecalis    Next Abstract"Effects of agriculture upon the air quality and climate: research, policy, and regulations" »

J Chromatogr A


Title:Analytical performance of three commonly used extraction methods for the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of wine volatile compounds
Author(s):Andujar-Ortiz I; Moreno-Arribas MV; Martin-Alvarez PJ; Pozo-Bayon MA;
Address:"Instituto de Fermentaciones Industriales (CSIC), Juan de la Cierva, 3, 28006 Madrid, Spain"
Journal Title:J Chromatogr A
Year:2009
Volume:20090826
Issue:43
Page Number:7351 - 7357
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.055
ISSN/ISBN:1873-3778 (Electronic) 0021-9673 (Linking)
Abstract:"The analytical performance of three extraction procedures based on cold liquid-liquid extraction using dicloromethane (LLE), solid phase extraction (SPE) using a styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer and headspace solid phase microextraction (SPME) using a carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane coated fibre has been evaluated based on the analysis of 30 representative wine volatile compounds. From the comparison of the three procedures, LLE and SPE showed very good linearity covering a wide range of concentrations of wine volatile compounds, low detection limits, high recovery for most of the volatile compounds under study and higher sensitivity compared to the headspace-SPME procedure. The latter showed in general, poor recovery for polar volatile compounds. Despite some drawbacks associated with the LLE and SPE procedures such as the more tedious sampling treatment and the use of organic solvents, the analytical performance of both procedures showed that they are more adequate for the analysis of wine volatiles"
Keywords:Chemical Fractionation/*methods Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/*methods Linear Models Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Solid Phase Extraction/methods Solid Phase Microextraction/methods Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis Wine;
Notes:"MedlineAndujar-Ortiz, I Moreno-Arribas, M V Martin-Alvarez, P J Pozo-Bayon, M A eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Netherlands 2009/09/08 J Chromatogr A. 2009 Oct 23; 1216(43):7351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.055. Epub 2009 Aug 26"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024