Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractPossibilities to control the horse chestnut leaf miner (Cameraria ohridella) in urban environments    Next AbstractTrail-following behavior ofReticulitermes hesperus Banks (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) »

J Sci Food Agric


Title:Sensory properties of yellow pea and macadamia honeys from conventional and flow hive extraction methods
Author(s):Grace E; Olarte Mantilla SM; Sunarharum WB; Ong CM; Waanders J; D'Arcy BR; Smyth HE;
Address:"BeeInventive Pty Ltd, Bangalow, New South Wales, Australia. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Coopers Plains, Queensland, Australia. Brawijaya Senso-Gastronomy Center, Food Science and Technology, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia. School of Agricultural and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia"
Journal Title:J Sci Food Agric
Year:2020
Volume:20200118
Issue:5
Page Number:2027 - 2034
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10221
ISSN/ISBN:1097-0010 (Electronic) 0022-5142 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: The process of harvesting honey is time consuming and labor intensive. A new system, the Flow Frame, has drastically simplified the harvesting process, enabling honey to be extracted directly from the hive with minimal processing. The sensory profile of honey is influenced, first, by botanical origin and subsequently by processing and storage parameters. A reduction in harvest processing may thus influence the sensory profile of honey harvested from FFs compared to that of honey produced from conventional processing. To test this hypothesis, two monofloral honeys (macadamia and yellow pea) were harvested from FFs, or by conventional honey extraction. Sensory profiling using conventional descriptive analysis was carried out for each floral source with an experienced trained panel. RESULTS: The two monofloral honeys harvested using the FF system had significantly (p < 0.05) higher floral and cleaner aftertaste sensory scores than the honey extracted using commercial (C) methods that involve the use of heat and centrifugation. CONCLUSION: The flow system retains honey's natural sensory properties compared to harvesting methods that require heat and centrifugation. (c) 2019 Society of Chemical Industry"
Keywords:Adult Aged Color Female Food Analysis Food Quality Honey/*analysis Humans Lathyrus/*chemistry Macadamia/*chemistry Male Middle Aged Taste Viscosity aroma flow hive honey macadamia sensory descriptive analysis volatile compounds yellow pea;
Notes:"MedlineGrace, Emily Olarte Mantilla, Sandra Milena Sunarharum, Wenny Bekti Ong, Cheng Mun Waanders, Jennifer D'Arcy, Bruce Robert Smyth, Heather Eunice eng England 2019/12/20 J Sci Food Agric. 2020 Mar 30; 100(5):2027-2034. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10221. Epub 2020 Jan 18"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024