| Title: | An assessment of important SPECIATE profiles in the EPA emissions modeling platform and current data gaps |
| Author(s): | Bray CD; Strum M; Simon H; Riddick L; Kosusko M; Menetrez M; Hays MD; Rao V; |
| Address: | "Contractor to the Air, Climate and Energy National Program, US EPA, RTP, NC, USA. Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, US EPA, RTP, NC, USA. National Exposure Research Laboratory, US EPA, RTP, NC, USA. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, US EPA, RTP, NC, USA" |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.013 |
| ISSN/ISBN: | 1352-2310 (Print) 1352-2310 (Linking) |
| Abstract: | "The United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s SPECIATE database contains speciated particulate matter (PM) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions profiles. Emissions profiles from anthropogenic combustion, industry, wildfires, and agricultural sources among others are key inputs for creating chemically-resolved emissions inventories for air quality modeling. While the database and its use for air quality modeling are routinely updated and evaluated, this work sets out to systematically prioritize future improvements and communicate speciation data needs to the research community. We first identify the most prominent profiles (PM and VOC) used in the EPA's 2014 emissions modeling platform based on PM mass and VOC mass and reactivity. It is important to note that the on-road profiles were excluded from this analysis since speciation for these profiles is computed internally in the MOVES model. We then investigate these profiles further for quality and to determine whether they were being appropriately matched to source types while also considering regional variability of speciated pollutants. We then applied a quantitative needs assessment ranking system which rates the profile based on age, appropriateness (i.e. is the profile being used appropriately), prevalence in the EPA modeling platform and the quality of the reference. Our analysis shows that the highest ranked profiles (e.g. profile assignments with the highest priority for updates) include PM(2.5) profiles for fires (prescribed, agricultural and wild) and VOC profiles for crude oil storage tanks and residential wood combustion of pine wood. Top ranked profiles may indicate either that there are problems with the currently available source testing or that current mappings of profiles to source categories within EPA's modeling platform need improvement. Through this process, we have identified 29 emissions sourcecategories that would benefit from updated mapping. Many of these mapping mismatches are due to lack of emissions testing for appropriate source categories. In addition, we conclude that new source emissions testing would be especially beneficial for residential wood combustion, nonroad gasoline exhaust and nonroad diesel equipment" |
| Keywords: | Pm2.5 PM2.5 speciation Speciate Voc VOC speciation; |
| Notes: | "PubMed-not-MEDLINEBray, Casey D Strum, Madeleine Simon, Heather Riddick, Lee Kosusko, Mike Menetrez, Marc Hays, Michael D Rao, Venkatesh eng EPA999999/ImEPA/Intramural EPA/ England 2020/05/29 Atmos Environ (1994). 2019 Jun 15; 207:93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.013" |
