Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEvaluation of traps and lures for mass trapping of Mediterranean fruit fly in citrus groves    Next AbstractBait station devices can improve mass trapping performance for the control of the Mediterranean fruit fly »

Pest Manag Sci


Title:Efficacy of attract-and-kill devices for the control of Ceratitis capitata
Author(s):Navarro-Llopis V; Primo J; Vacas S;
Address:"Centro de Ecologia Quimica Agricola (CEQA-IAM), Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain. vinallo@ceqa.upv.es"
Journal Title:Pest Manag Sci
Year:2013
Volume:20120912
Issue:4
Page Number:478 - 482
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3393
ISSN/ISBN:1526-4998 (Electronic) 1526-498X (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: The control of Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann traditionally has relied on chemical control with organophosphate insecticides. The use of many of these substances has been banned by new European directives; therefore, the development of new control methods is essential to manage this pest. Bait sprays with spinosad, mass trapping and lure-and-kill techniques have been the base for new integrated pest management programmes. In this study, a 2 year field trial was conducted in two citrus areas to test the efficacy of attract-and-kill devices against mass trapping and spinosad-plus-bait treatments. RESULTS: The Magnet((R)) MED attract-and-kill device, Spintor((R)) treatments and mass trapping achieved good control of C. capitata populations, as confirmed by low percentages of damaged fruit in the assessments performed during the harvest period. On the other hand, fly population levels on plots treated with other attract-and-kill prototype devices increased more than threefold by comparison with the populations recorded in the rest of the treated plots. The same effect was observed for fruit damage, with 6-8 times less damage with Magnet((R)) MED and spinosad treatments, respectively, than with the attract-and-kill prototype devices. CONCLUSION: By using an effective attractant, conventional trapping systems can be replaced with cheaper and easier-to-handle attract-and-kill devices. The efficacy of these devices and their advantages over conventional mass trapping systems are discussed"
Keywords:Animals *Ceratitis capitata Drug Combinations Female Fruit Herbivory Insect Control/*instrumentation *Insecticides *Macrolides Male;
Notes:"MedlineNavarro-Llopis, Vicente Primo, Jaime Vacas, Sandra eng Evaluation Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2012/09/13 Pest Manag Sci. 2013 Apr; 69(4):478-82. doi: 10.1002/ps.3393. Epub 2012 Sep 12"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024