Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract[Influence of B mating-type factor on recovery of nuclear types from dikaryons in Lentinula edodes]    Next AbstractGenomic adaptation to polyphagy and insecticides in a major East Asian noctuid pest »

Tob Control


Title:Chemical evaluation of electronic cigarettes
Author(s):Cheng T;
Address:
Journal Title:Tob Control
Year:2014
Volume:23 Suppl 2
Issue:Suppl 2
Page Number:ii11 - ii17
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051482
ISSN/ISBN:1468-3318 (Electronic) 0964-4563 (Print) 0964-4563 (Linking)
Abstract:"OBJECTIVE: To review the available evidence evaluating the chemicals in refill solutions, cartridges, aerosols and environmental emissions of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted to identify research related to e-cigarettes and chemistry using 5 reference databases and 11 search terms. The search date range was January 2007 to September 2013. The search yielded 36 articles, of which 29 were deemed relevant for analysis. RESULTS: The levels of nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), aldehydes, metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), flavours, solvent carriers and tobacco alkaloids in e-cigarette refill solutions, cartridges, aerosols and environmental emissions vary considerably. The delivery of nicotine and the release of TSNAs, aldehydes and metals are not consistent across products. Furthermore, the nicotine level listed on the labels of e-cigarette cartridges and refill solutions is often significantly different from measured values. Phenolic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and drugs have also been reported in e-cigarette refill solutions, cartridges and aerosols. Varying results in particle size distributions of particular matter emissions from e-cigarettes across studies have been observed. Methods applied for the generation and chemical analyses of aerosols differ across studies. Performance characteristics of e-cigarette devices also vary across and within brands. CONCLUSIONS: Additional studies based on knowledge of e-cigarette user behaviours and scientifically validated aerosol generation and chemical analysis methods would be helpful in generating reliable measures of chemical quantities. This would allow comparisons of e-cigarette aerosol and traditional smoke constituent levels and would inform an evaluation of the toxicity potential of e-cigarettes"
Keywords:"Aerosols Aldehydes/analysis Chromatography, Liquid *Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Metals/analysis Nicotine/analysis Nitrosamines/analysis Particle Size Tandem Mass Spectrometry Carcinogens Electronic nicotine delivery devices Non-cigarette tobacco;"
Notes:"MedlineCheng, Tianrong eng Review England 2014/04/16 Tob Control. 2014 May; 23 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii11-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051482"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-12-2024