Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractRenin mRNA is upregulated in testes and testicular cells in response to treatment with aflatoxin B1    Next AbstractPheromonal control of mating patterns in Drosophila melanogaster »

Biol Open


Title:Social signals and aversive learning in honey bee drones and workers
Author(s):Avalos A; Perez E; Vallejo L; Perez ME; Abramson CI; Giray T;
Address:"Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA avalos0912@gmail.com. Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR 00931, USA. Department of Mathematics, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR 00931, USA. Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74074, USA"
Journal Title:Biol Open
Year:2017
Volume:20170115
Issue:1
Page Number:41 - 49
DOI: 10.1242/bio.021543
ISSN/ISBN:2046-6390 (Print) 2046-6390 (Electronic) 2046-6390 (Linking)
Abstract:"The dissemination of information is a basic element of group cohesion. In honey bees (Apis mellifera Linnaeus 1758), like in other social insects, the principal method for colony-wide information exchange is communication via pheromones. This medium of communication allows multiple individuals to conduct tasks critical to colony survival. Social signaling also establishes conflict at the level of the individual who must trade-off between attending to the immediate environment or the social demand. In this study we examined this conflict by challenging highly social worker honey bees, and less social male drone honey bees undergoing aversive training by presenting them with a social stress signal (isopentyl acetate, IPA). We utilized IPA exposure methods that caused lower learning performance in appetitive learning in workers. Exposure to isopentyl acetate (IPA) did not affect performance of drones and had a dose-specific effect on worker response, with positive effects diminishing at higher IPA doses. The IPA effects are specific because non-social cues, such as the odor cineole, improve learning performance in drones, and social homing signals (geraniol) did not have a discernible effect on drone or worker performance. We conclude that social signals do generate conflict and that response to them is dependent on signal relevance to the individual as well as the context. We discuss the effect of social signal on learning both related to its social role and potential evolutionary history"
Keywords:Alarm pheromone Associative learning Drone Honey bee Semiochemicals Social communication;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEAvalos, Arian Perez, Eddie Vallejo, Lianna Perez, Maria E Abramson, Charles I Giray, Tugrul eng R25 GM061151/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/ England 2016/11/30 Biol Open. 2017 Jan 15; 6(1):41-49. doi: 10.1242/bio.021543"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-12-2024