Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Avoiding Unwanted Vicinity Effects With Attract-and-Kill Tactics for Harlequin Bug, Murgantia histrionica (Hahn) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)"    Next AbstractOccupational exposures during the World Trade Center disaster response »

Pest Manag Sci


Title:Evaluating a push-pull strategy for management of Drosophila suzukii Matsumura in red raspberry
Author(s):Wallingford AK; Cha DH; Loeb GM;
Address:"Cornell University, New York Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY, USA. USDA-ARS, US Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Hilo, HI, USA"
Journal Title:Pest Manag Sci
Year:2018
Volume:20170912
Issue:1
Page Number:120 - 125
DOI: 10.1002/ps.4666
ISSN/ISBN:1526-4998 (Electronic) 1526-498X (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Drosophila suzukii Matsumura is a serious pest of small fruits that lays its eggs in growing fruit. Current management strategies rely on an unsustainable schedule of foliar applications of chemical insecticides. Alternative approaches to suppressing oviposition are under investigation, such as attract-and-kill and the use of oviposition deterrents. Here, we evaluated two behavioral control approaches in combination as a push-pull strategy using laboratory and field assays. RESULTS: In laboratory caged assays, both an attractive mass trapping device (pull) and an oviposition deterrent (push: 1-octen-3-ol) reduced oviposition by D. suzukii, and the combination of the two (push-pull) resulted in significantly greater reduction than either treatment alone. In field experiments, oviposition reduction was observed in fruit from plots treated with oviposition deterrent (push) or a combination of mass trapping devices and deterrent (push-pull) compared with fruit from control plots. However, oviposition in plots with mass trapping devices (pull) was higher than observed in all other treatments. Additionally, the protection provided by the deterrent in push plots extended to the entire plot rather than just in fruit closest to deterrent dispensers. CONCLUSION: Push-pull treatments negatively affected D. suzukii infestation in both laboratory and field experiments. The reduction in oviposition observed in laboratory experiments was based on the additive effect of push and pull components acting on a finite population, while the reduction observed in field experiments appeared to be mainly based on the effect of pull components. We discuss potential underlying reasons for the discrepancy results and suggest potential improvements. (c) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry"
Keywords:Animals *Drosophila Female Insect Control/*methods *Insecticides *Octanols Oviposition/*drug effects Rubus/*growth & development 1-octen-3-ol mass trapping oviposition deterrent push-pull;
Notes:"MedlineWallingford, Anna K Cha, Dong H Loeb, Gregory M eng Comparative Study England 2017/07/18 Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Jan; 74(1):120-125. doi: 10.1002/ps.4666. Epub 2017 Sep 12"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-12-2024