Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDecoding an olfactory mechanism of kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in a primate    Next AbstractBiogas pre-upgrading by adsorption of trace compounds onto granular activated carbons and an activated carbon fiber-cloth »

J Insect Physiol


Title:Male orientation to trail sex pheromones in parasitoid wasps: does the spatial distribution of virgin females matter?
Author(s):Bouletreau M; Mesquita AL; Fouillet P; Fauvergue X;
Address:"UMR 2558, Biometrie, Genetique et Biologie des Populations, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622, Villeurbanne, France"
Journal Title:J Insect Physiol
Year:1998
Volume:44
Issue:7-Aug
Page Number:667 - 675
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1910(97)00172-8
ISSN/ISBN:1879-1611 (Electronic) 0022-1910 (Linking)
Abstract:"We studied male locomotory response to trails and patches of sex pheromone (left respectively by free-ranging females and females constrained to stay on a small area) in the two parasitoids Aphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and Trichogramma brassicae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Under the hypothesis that the spatial distribution of virgin females differs between these species (scattered among host plants in A. asychis, gregarious at emergence sites in T. brassicae), we predicted that male locomotory response to their sex pheromones should also differ: A. asychis males should follow pheromone trails on plants in order to encounter the females along these trails, whereas T. brassicae males should stay on pheromone patches, at emergence sites, and mate the females on these patches. Using an improved video-tracking system, we found that males of both species respond to conspecific sex pheromone trails and patches, but that the response does not differ much between species. Males released on marked substrates walked in a more convoluted pattern (i.e. higher path fractal dimension and higher number of crossings within tracks) than males released on unmarked substrates. On pheromone patches, males turned persistently in the same direction when leaving the patch, which explains a higher number of visits on marked patches than on unmarked patches, and possibly, higher track convolution on pheromone trails. Contrary to our hypothesis, male A. asychis did not follow female trails more accurately than male T. brassicae, and male T. brassicae did not stay longer on pheromone patches than male A. asychis. We argue that these discrepancies between our predictions and the observed responses originates from discrepancies between the assumed spatial distribution of virgin females and their actual distribution in the wild"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEBouletreau, M Mesquita, A LM Fouillet, P Fauvergue, X eng England 2003/05/29 J Insect Physiol. 1998 Jul; 44(7-8):667-675. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(97)00172-8"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-11-2024