Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEstimation of volatile organic compounds in Kuwaiti houses after the Gulf war    Next AbstractEfficacy of volatile compounds from Streptomyces philanthi RL-1-178 as a biofumigant for controlling growth and aflatoxin production of the two aflatoxin-producing fungi on stored soybean seeds »

Talanta


Title:Comparison of common components analysis with principal components analysis and independent components analysis: Application to SPME-GC-MS volatolomic signatures
Author(s):Bouhlel J; Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse D; Abouelkaram S; Baeza E; Jondreville C; Travel A; Ratel J; Engel E; Rutledge DN;
Address:"UMR Ingenierie Procedes Aliments, AgroParisTech, Inra, Universite Paris-Saclay, 91300 Massy, France; INRA, UR 370 QuaPA, MASS Laboratory, Saint-Genes-Champanelle, France. UMR Ingenierie Procedes Aliments, AgroParisTech, Inra, Universite Paris-Saclay, 91300 Massy, France. INRA, UR 370 QuaPA, MASS Laboratory, Saint-Genes-Champanelle, France. ITAVI, UR83 Recherches Avicoles, INRA, Centre Val de Loire, 37380 Nouzilly, France. UMR Ingenierie Procedes Aliments, AgroParisTech, Inra, Universite Paris-Saclay, 91300 Massy, France. Electronic address: douglas.rutledge@agroparistech.fr"
Journal Title:Talanta
Year:2018
Volume:20171018
Issue:
Page Number:854 - 863
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.10.025
ISSN/ISBN:1873-3573 (Electronic) 0039-9140 (Linking)
Abstract:"The aim of this work is to compare a novel exploratory chemometrics method, Common Components Analysis (CCA), with Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Independent Components Analysis (ICA). CCA consists in adapting the multi-block statistical method known as Common Components and Specific Weights Analysis (CCSWA or ComDim) by applying it to a single data matrix, with one variable per block. As an application, the three methods were applied to SPME-GC-MS volatolomic signatures of livers in an attempt to reveal volatile organic compounds (VOCs) markers of chicken exposure to different types of micropollutants. An application of CCA to the initial SPME-GC-MS data revealed a drift in the sample Scores along CC2, as a function of injection order, probably resulting from time-related evolution in the instrument. This drift was eliminated by orthogonalization of the data set with respect to CC2, and the resulting data are used as the orthogonalized data input into each of the three methods. Since the first step in CCA is to norm-scale all the variables, preliminary data scaling has no effect on the results, so that CCA was applied only to orthogonalized SPME-GC-MS data, while, PCA and ICA were applied to the 'orthogonalized', 'orthogonalized and Pareto-scaled', and 'orthogonalized and autoscaled' data. The comparison showed that PCA results were highly dependent on the scaling of variables, contrary to ICA where the data scaling did not have a strong influence. Nevertheless, for both PCA and ICA the clearest separations of exposed groups were obtained after autoscaling of variables. The main part of this work was to compare the CCA results using the orthogonalized data with those obtained with PCA and ICA applied to orthogonalized and autoscaled variables. The clearest separations of exposed chicken groups were obtained by CCA. CCA Loadings also clearly identified the variables contributing most to the Common Components giving separations. The PCA Loadings did not highlight the most influencing variables for each separation, whereas the ICA Loadings highlighted the same variables as did CCA. This study shows the potential of CCA for the extraction of pertinent information from a data matrix, using a procedure based on an original optimisation criterion, to produce results that are complementary, and in some cases may be superior, to those of PCA and ICA"
Keywords:Common Components Analysis (CCA) Independent Components Analysis (ICA) Liver markers Principal Components Analysis (PCA) Spme-gc-ms Volatolomic;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEBouhlel, Jihene Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse, Delphine Abouelkaram, Said Baeza, Elisabeth Jondreville, Catherine Travel, Angelique Ratel, Jeremy Engel, Erwan Rutledge, Douglas N eng Netherlands 2017/11/16 Talanta. 2018 Feb 1; 178:854-863. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Oct 18"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 16-11-2024