Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Determination of exposure to benzene, toluene and xylenes in Turkish primary school children by analysis of breath and by environmental passive sampling"    Next AbstractInfluence of combined dust reducing carpet and compact air filtration unit on the indoor air quality of a classroom »

J Environ Monit


Title:Influence of a portable air treatment unit on health-related quality indicators of indoor air in a classroom
Author(s):Scheepers PT; Cremers R; van Hout SP; Anzion RB;
Address:"Research Laboratory Molecular Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. p.scheepers@ebh.umcn.nl"
Journal Title:J Environ Monit
Year:2012
Volume:20111025
Issue:2
Page Number:429 - 439
DOI: 10.1039/c1em10559k
ISSN/ISBN:1464-0333 (Electronic) 1464-0325 (Linking)
Abstract:"During periods of two weeks in February and June 2010 the performance of portable air treatment units (PATUs) was evaluated in a primary school classroom using indicators of indoor air quality. Air samples were collected in an undisturbed setting on weekend days and in an occupied setting during teaching hours. In the first week PATUs were turned off and in the second week they were turned on. On weekend days PATUs reduced indoor levels of PM-10 by 87% in February and by 70% in June compared to weekend days when PATUs were turned off. On schooldays, indoor PM-10 was increased by 6% in February and reduced by 42% in June. For PM-2.5 reductions on weekend days were 89% in February and 80% in June. On school days PM-2.5 was increased by 15% in February and reduced by 83% in June. Turning on the PATUs reduced total VOC by 80% on weekend days and by 57% on school days (but not in June). No influence on formaldehyde, NO(2), O(3) and molds was observed. PATUs appeared to be less effective in removal of air pollutants when used in an occupied classroom compared to an unoccupied setting. Our study suggests that such devices should be tested in real-life settings to evaluate their influence on indoor air quality"
Keywords:"Air Microbiology/standards Air Pollutants/*analysis/standards Air Pollution, Indoor/*analysis/prevention & control/statistics & numerical data Child Environmental Monitoring Filtration/*instrumentation Formaldehyde/analysis/standards Fungi Health Status H;"
Notes:"MedlineScheepers, Paul T J Cremers, Robbert van Hout, Stef P R Anzion, Rob B M eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2011/10/27 J Environ Monit. 2012 Feb; 14(2):429-39. doi: 10.1039/c1em10559k. Epub 2011 Oct 25"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 28-09-2024