Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Mating Disruption of Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell) (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) in Fruit Crops"    Next AbstractCyanogenesis of wild lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) is an efficient direct defence in nature »

J Insect Sci


Title:Mating behavior of Pseudococcus calceolariae and Pseudococcus longispinus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae): are asexual reproduction and hybridization possible?
Author(s):Ballesteros C; Chorbadjian RA; Zaviezo T;
Address:"Facultad de Agronomia e Ingenieria Forestal, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Avda. Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago 7820436, Chile"
Journal Title:J Insect Sci
Year:2023
Volume:23
Issue:4
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iead058
ISSN/ISBN:1536-2442 (Electronic) 1536-2442 (Linking)
Abstract:"The study of insect reproduction is important from both basic and applied perspectives, particularly in mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), because of the diversity of reproduction modes and also because they are important agricultural pests. Sex pheromone control strategies are currently being developed for many species. Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell) and Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni Tozzetti) are closely related species that often coexist in the same host plant. In this study, mating behavior, the possible occurrence of asexual reproduction, and hybridization between them were investigated. We confirmed that both species did not show asexual reproduction and required the presence of a male to reproduce. When couples of the same species were put together, males had a highly stereotyped mating behavior, and females showed an active role in mating success by accepting or rejecting males with abdominal movements. In hybridization trials, no progeny was obtained for any of the interspecific combinations. Moreover, in interspecific pairs, males mainly moved randomly in the arena without direct contact with females and females showed no willingness to mate, escape, or not move in the presence of the male. Therefore, courtship and copulation success in both species were directly related to the specificity of the mating pair and, there was no evidence of hybridization. This information is useful for the understanding of reproduction in this family and supports the development of management techniques based on sex pheromones to disrupt reproduction or to monitor these mealybug species populations"
Keywords:"Male Female Animals *Hemiptera/genetics *Sex Attractants Reproduction, Asexual Hybridization, Genetic Copulation Reproduction courtship ethogram sex pheromone stereotype index;"
Notes:"MedlineBallesteros, Carolina Chorbadjian, Rodrigo A Zaviezo, Tania eng 21150446/ANID Doctoral fellowship/ 2023/08/11 J Insect Sci. 2023 Jul 1; 23(4):17. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iead058"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-11-2024