Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractLargest vertebrate vomeronasal type 1 receptor gene repertoire in the semiaquatic platypus    Next AbstractNegative feedback enables fast and flexible collective decision-making in ants »

Mol Biol Evol


Title:Distinct evolutionary patterns between chemoreceptors of 2 vertebrate olfactory systems and the differential tuning hypothesis
Author(s):Grus WE; Zhang J;
Address:"Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, USA"
Journal Title:Mol Biol Evol
Year:2008
Volume:20080505
Issue:8
Page Number:1593 - 1601
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn107
ISSN/ISBN:1537-1719 (Electronic) 0737-4038 (Print) 0737-4038 (Linking)
Abstract:"Most tetrapod vertebrates have 2 olfactory systems, the main olfactory system (MOS) and the vomeronasal system (VNS). According to the dual olfactory hypothesis, the MOS detects environmental odorants, whereas the VNS recognizes intraspecific pheromonal cues. However, this strict functional distinction has been blurred by recent reports that both systems can perceive both types of signals. Studies of a limited number of receptors suggest that MOS receptors are broadly tuned generalists, whereas VNS receptors are narrowly tuned specialists. However, whether this distinction applies to all MOS and VNS receptors remains unknown. The differential tuning hypothesis predicts that generalist MOS receptors detect an overlapping set of ligands and thus are more likely to be conserved over evolutionary time than specialist VNS receptors, which would evolve in a more lineage-specific manner. Here we test this prediction for all olfactory chemoreceptors by examining the evolutionary patterns of MOS-expressed odorant receptors (ORs) and trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) and VNS-expressed vomeronasal type 1 receptors (V1Rs) and vomeronasal type 2 receptors (V2Rs) in 7 tetrapods (mouse, rat, dog, opossum, platypus, chicken, and frog). The phylogenies of V1Rs and V2Rs show abundant lineage-specific gene gains/losses and virtually no one-to-one orthologs between species. Opposite patterns are found for ORs and TAARs. Analysis of functional data and ligand-binding sites of ORs confirms that paralogous chemoreceptors are more likely than orthologs to have different ligands and that functional divergence between paralogous chemoreceptors is established relatively quickly following gene duplication. Together, these results strongly suggest that the functional profile of the VNS chemoreceptor repertoire evolves much faster than that of the MOS chemoreceptor repertoire and that the differential tuning hypothesis applies to the majority, if not all, of MOS and VNS receptors"
Keywords:"Animals Chemoreceptor Cells/*cytology Computational Biology *Evolution, Molecular *Phylogeny Receptors, Pheromone/*genetics Smell/*genetics/physiology Species Specificity Vertebrates/*genetics Vomeronasal Organ/*cytology;"
Notes:"MedlineGrus, Wendy E Zhang, Jianzhi eng R01 GM080285/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/ T32 HG000040/HG/NHGRI NIH HHS/ R01GM80285/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/ T32HG000040/HG/NHGRI NIH HHS/ Comparative Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural 2008/05/08 Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Aug; 25(8):1593-601. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn107. Epub 2008 May 5"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 16-11-2024