Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractWater deficit enhances the transmission of plant viruses by insect vectors    Next AbstractTemperature limits trail following behaviour through pheromone decay in ants »

J Breath Res


Title:The potential role of exhaled breath analysis in the diagnostic process of pneumonia-a systematic review
Author(s):van Oort PM; Povoa P; Schnabel R; Dark P; Artigas A; Bergmans D; Felton T; Coelho L; Schultz MJ; Fowler SJ; Bos LD;
Address:"Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands"
Journal Title:J Breath Res
Year:2018
Volume:20180206
Issue:2
Page Number:24001 -
DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/aaa499
ISSN/ISBN:1752-7163 (Electronic) 1752-7155 (Linking)
Abstract:"Diagnostic strategies currently used for pneumonia are time-consuming, lack accuracy and suffer from large inter-observer variability. Exhaled breath contains thousands of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which include products of host and pathogen metabolism. In this systematic review we investigated the use of so-called 'breathomics' for diagnosing pneumonia. A Medline search yielded 18 manuscripts reporting on animal and human studies using organic and inorganic molecules in exhaled breath, that all could be used to answer whether analysis of VOC profiles could potentially improve the diagnostic process of pneumonia. Papers were categorised based on their specific aims; the exclusion of pneumonia; the detection of specific respiratory pathogens; and whether targeted or untargeted VOC analysis was used. Ten studies reported on the association between VOCs and presence of pneumonia. Eight studies demonstrated a difference in exhaled VOCs between pneumonia and controls; in the individual studies this discrimination was based on unique sets of VOCs. Eight studies reported on the accuracy of a breath test for a specific respiratory pathogen: five of these concerned pre-clinical studies in animals. All studies were valued as having a high risk of bias, except for one study that used an external validation cohort. The findings in the identified studies are promising. However, as yet no breath test has been shown to have sufficient diagnostic accuracy for pneumonia. We are in need of studies that further translate the knowledge from discovery studies to clinical practice"
Keywords:Animals Breath Tests/*methods Electronic Nose *Exhalation Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Humans Pneumonia/*diagnosis Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis;
Notes:"Medlinevan Oort, Pouline M Povoa, Pedro Schnabel, Ronny Dark, Paul Artigas, Antonio Bergmans, Dennis C J J Felton, Timothy Coelho, Luis Schultz, Marcus J Fowler, Stephen J Bos, Lieuwe D eng II-LA-0214-20009/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review England 2018/01/03 J Breath Res. 2018 Feb 6; 12(2):024001. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aaa499"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024