Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractField evaluation of the bacterial volatile derivative 3-pentanol in priming for induced resistance in pepper    Next AbstractThe Association between the Concentration of Heavy Metals in the Indoor Atmosphere and Atopic Dermatitis Symptoms in Children Aged between 4 and 13 Years: A Pilot Study »

Int J Environ Res Public Health


Title:The Effect of Mechanical Tongue Cleaning on Oral Malodor and Tongue Coating
Author(s):Choi HN; Cho YS; Koo JW;
Address:"Department of Dental Hygiene, Jeonju Kijeon College, Jeonju 54989, Korea. Department of Dental Hygiene, Namseoul University, Cheonan 31020, Korea. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea"
Journal Title:Int J Environ Res Public Health
Year:2021
Volume:20211223
Issue:1
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010108
ISSN/ISBN:1660-4601 (Electronic) 1661-7827 (Print) 1660-4601 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Mechanical tongue cleaning is an important oral hygiene procedure; it is known that a significant cause of volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs), a major component of bad breath, is due to the bacteria coating the tongue. This study was conducted to identify the effect of mechanical tongue cleaning on reducing bad breath and tongue coating. METHODS: Various mechanical tongue-cleaning methods were studied, including removing tongue coating using a toothbrush, removing tongue coating using a tongue scraper, and removing tongue coating using a toothbrush and a tongue scraper together. The results were as follows. RESULTS: First, the organic bad breath measurement value after cleaning the tongue significantly decreased in the group using only the toothbrush, the group using only the tongue scraper, and the group using both the toothbrush and the tongue scraper. However, there was no difference between the groups. Second, after cleaning the tongue, the measured values of the tongue coating in the values of WTCI (Winkel's tongue coating index) and Qray view were significantly reduced in all three groups, and there was no difference between the groups. Third, the gas measurement value in the oral cavity using a machine significantly decreased only the H(2)S value of the group using the tongue scraper immediately after the mechanical tongue cleaning. CONCLUSIONS: From these results, it can be confirmed that mechanical tongue cleaning is effective at reducing bad breath and tongue coating. However, in this study, there was no difference in the reduction effect according to the tools (groups) used for mechanical tongue cleaning. It can therefore be seen that wiping accurately from the rear of the tongue to the front is more effective at reducing bad breath and tongue coating"
Keywords:"Diagnostic Tests, Routine *Halitosis/prevention & control Humans Sulfur Compounds Tongue Toothbrushing mechanical tongue cleaning oral malodor tongue coating tongue scraper toothbrush;"
Notes:"MedlineChoi, Ha-Na Cho, Young-Sik Koo, Jung-Wan eng Switzerland 2022/01/12 Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23; 19(1):108. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010108"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024