Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractTetrachloroethylene emissions and exposure in dry cleaning    Next AbstractUptake of aromatic hydrocarbon vapors (benzene and phenanthrene) at the air-water interface of micron-size water droplets »

Transl Cancer Res


Title:Reviewing the oral carcinogenic potential of E-cigarettes using the Bradford Hill criteria of causation
Author(s):Raj AT; Sujatha G; Muruganandhan J; Kumar SS; Bharkavi SI; Varadarajan S; Patil S; Awan KH;
Address:"Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India. Sai Srinivas Dental Care, Chennai, India. Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, Division of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia. College of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT, USA"
Journal Title:Transl Cancer Res
Year:2020
Volume:9
Issue:4
Page Number:3142 - 3152
DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2020.01.23
ISSN/ISBN:2219-6803 (Electronic) 2218-676X (Print) 2218-676X (Linking)
Abstract:"The past decade has seen a surge in the use of e-cigarettes, which has prompted the medical community to assess any associated potential health hazards. A major concern was the risk of cancer. Chemical analysis of e-cigarettes has shown the presence of volatile organic compounds with the potential for carcinogenicity. Comparative toxicology analysis has shown e-cigarette to have relatively lower dosages of toxins than conventional combustible cigarettes. Based on comparative analysis, e-cigarettes have been increasingly advocated as a safe alternative to conventional cigarettes. It is vital to recognize that presence of relatively lower toxin level does not preclude carcinogenic potential. The nicotine present in the e-cigarette was presumed to be the major cytotoxic agents, thus nicotine-free e-cigarette was considered as inert. On the contrary, experimental studies on oral cell lines have shown DNA strand breaks on exposure to e-cigarette vapors with or without nicotine. In addition, dysregulations of genes associated with carcinogenic pathways have also been demonstrated in oral tissues exposed to e-cigarette vapors. Despite alarming molecular data, the oral carcinogenic potential of e-cigarette remains unclear, which can be attributed to the lack of long-term prospective and large-scale case-control studies. As e-cigarette users often have other well-established risk factors (conventional cigarette smoking, alcohol, etc.) as associated habits, it is difficult to assess e-cigarette as an independent risk factor for oral cancer. Thus, the present manuscript aims to review the published literature using the Brad Ford Hill criteria of causation to determine the oral carcinogenic potential of e-cigarettes"
Keywords:Carcinogens cigarette smoking electronic nicotine delivery systems mouth neoplasms volatile organic compounds;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINERaj, A Thirumal Sujatha, Govindarajan Muruganandhan, Jayanandan Kumar, S Satish Bharkavi, Sk Indu Varadarajan, Saranya Patil, Shankargouda Awan, Kamran Habib eng Review China 2020/04/01 Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Apr; 9(4):3142-3152. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.01.23"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-11-2024