Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractInfluence of a portable air treatment unit on health-related quality indicators of indoor air in a classroom    Next AbstractChemical Characterization of the Indoor Air Quality of a University Hospital: Penetration of Outdoor Air Pollutants »

Environ Sci Process Impacts


Title:Influence of combined dust reducing carpet and compact air filtration unit on the indoor air quality of a classroom
Author(s):Scheepers PT; de Hartog JJ; Reijnaerts J; Beckmann G; Anzion R; Poels K; Godderis L;
Address:"Dept. for Health Evidence, Radboudumc, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. paul.scheepers@radboudumc.nl"
Journal Title:Environ Sci Process Impacts
Year:2015
Volume:17
Issue:2
Page Number:316 - 325
DOI: 10.1039/c4em00506f
ISSN/ISBN:2050-7895 (Electronic) 2050-7887 (Linking)
Abstract:"Primary schools mostly rely on natural ventilation but also have an interest in affordable technology to improve indoor air quality (IAQ). Laboratory tests show promising results for dust reducing carpets and compact air filtration systems but there is no information available on the performance of these interventions in actual operating classrooms. An exploratory study was performed to evaluate a combination of the two systems in a primary school. Measurements of PM-10 and PM-2.5 were performed by filter sampling and aerosol spectrometry. Other IAQ parameters included black smoke (BS), volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and formaldehyde. Both interventions were introduced in one classroom during one week, using another classroom as a reference. In a second week the interventions were moved to the other classroom, using the first as a reference (cross-over design). In three remaining weeks the classrooms were compared without interventions. Indoor IAQ parameters were compared to the corresponding outdoor parameters using the indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratio. When the classrooms were occupied (teaching hours) interventions resulted in 27-43% reductions of PM-10, PM-2.5 and BS values. During the weekends the systems reduced these levels by 51-87%. Evaluations using the change in I/O ratios gave comparable results. Levels of VOC, NO2 and formaldehyde were rather low and a contribution of the interventions to the improvement of these gas phase IAQ parameters was inconclusive"
Keywords:"Air Pollutants/*analysis Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis/*prevention & control Dust/*analysis Environmental Monitoring Filtration *Floors and Floorcoverings Schools Ventilation;"
Notes:"MedlineScheepers, Paul T J de Hartog, Jeroen J Reijnaerts, Judith Beckmann, Gwendolyn Anzion, Rob Poels, Katrien Godderis, Lode eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2014/11/08 Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2015 Feb; 17(2):316-25. doi: 10.1039/c4em00506f"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024