Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractInsect pheromone olfaction: new targets for the design of species-selective pest control agents    Next AbstractInsect attractants »

J Agric Food Chem


Title:Agonists and antagonists of antennal responses of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) to the pheromone (+)-disparlure and other odorants
Author(s):Plettner E; Gries R;
Address:"Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. plettner@sfu.ca"
Journal Title:J Agric Food Chem
Year:2010
Volume:58
Issue:6
Page Number:3708 - 3719
DOI: 10.1021/jf904139e
ISSN/ISBN:1520-5118 (Electronic) 0021-8561 (Linking)
Abstract:"Insects use the sense of smell to guide many behaviors that are important for their survival. The gypsy moth uses a pheromone to bring females and males together over long distances. Male moth antennae are equipped with innervated sensory hairs that selectively respond to pheromone components and other odors. Host plant odors, in particular, are detected by moths and sometimes cause an enhancement of the antennal and behavioral responses of the moths to their pheromone. Inspired by naturally occurring agonists and antagonists of insect pheromone responses, we have screened, by electroantennogram (EAG) recordings, a collection of compound sets and of individual compounds. We have detected interference of some compounds with the EAG responses of male gypsy moth antennae to the pheromone. We describe three activities: (1) short-term inhibition or enhancement of mixed compound + pheromone plumes, (2) long-term inhibition of pure pheromone plumes following a mixed compound + pheromone plume, and (3) inhibition of the recovery phase of mixed compound + pheromone plumes. Long-term inhibition was robust, decayed within 30 s, and correlated with the inhibition of recovery; for both activities clear structure-activity patterns were detected. The commercial repellent N,N-diethyltoluamide (DEET) was included for comparison. The most active and reproducible short-term inhibitor was a mixture of 1-allyl-2,4-dimethoxybenzene and 2-allyl-1,3-dimethoxybenzene. The most active long-term inhibitors were a set of 1-alkoxy-4-propoxybenzenes, DEET, and 1-ethoxy-4-propoxybenzene. DEET was more specific in the olfactory responses it inhibited than 1-ethoxy-4-propoxybenzene, and DEET did not inhibit recovery, whereas 1-ethoxy-4-propoxybenzene did. Target sites for the three activities are discussed"
Keywords:"Alkanes/*agonists/*antagonists & inhibitors Animal Structures/chemistry/physiology Animals Behavior, Animal Electrophysiology Female Male Moths/chemistry/*physiology Odorants/analysis Pheromones/*agonists/*antagonists & inhibitors Smell;"
Notes:"MedlinePlettner, Erika Gries, Regine eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2010/03/03 J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Mar 24; 58(6):3708-19. doi: 10.1021/jf904139e"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 28-12-2024