Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Levels of pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in selected homes in the Bangkok metropolitan region, Thailand"    Next AbstractHow insects overcome two-component plant chemical defence: plant beta-glucosidases as the main target for herbivore adaptation »

Physiol Behav


Title:Characterizing the effects of 2-phenylethylamine and coyote urine on unconditioned and conditioned defensive behaviors in adolescent male and female Long-Evans hooded rats
Author(s):Pentkowski NS; Maestas-Olguin C; Martinez G;
Address:"Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, MSC03-2220, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. Electronic address: pentkowski@unm.edu. Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, MSC03-2220, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA"
Journal Title:Physiol Behav
Year:2022
Volume:20220203
Issue:
Page Number:113726 -
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113726
ISSN/ISBN:1873-507X (Electronic) 0031-9384 (Linking)
Abstract:"Predator odors provide critical information to prey species allowing them to gage potential threat via the detection of semiochemicals called kairomones. Recent reports indicate that the commercially available predator odor coyote urine (CU), and to a lesser extent 2-phenylethylamine (PEA), induce innate defensive behaviors in adult rats and mice. The aim of the present study was to see if the defense-inducing effects of CU and PEA would extend to adolescents. Specifically, we evaluated the ability of CU and PEA to induce unconditioned and conditioned defensive behavior in predator-odor naive adolescent male and female Long-Evans hooded rats. An additional group of males were exposed to the non-predatory aversive odor formalin to control for potential general aversive properties of the odorants. The data revealed that in males, both CU and PEA, but not formalin induced measures of risk assessment, whereas CU and formalin produced avoidance of the odor source. In partial contrast, both CU and PEA produced avoidance of the odor source and increased measures of risk assessment in females. Surprisingly males failed to show any measures of defense during the cue+context conditioning test trial. In contrast, in females both odorants produced marginal effects during re-exposure to the conditioning context, with CU inducing conditioned avoidance and PEA inducing conditioned risk assessment. We conclude that commercially available CU and PEA elicit a moderate defensive profile compared to previous reports examining cat fur/skin odor in male and female adolescent rats. Future research needs to examine additional concentrations of the odorants to determine if a more robust unconditioned defensive profile (e.g., freezing) can be induced by these predator odors, and whether the defensive profile responds to standard anxiolytic drugs"
Keywords:"Animals Female Male Mice Rats Behavior, Animal Conditioning, Psychological *Coyotes Formaldehyde Odorants Phenethylamines Predatory Behavior Rats, Long-Evans Anxiety Defense Fear Predation Predator odor Risk assessment;"
Notes:"MedlinePentkowski, Nathan S Maestas-Olguin, Carlos Martinez, Gabriela eng 2022/02/06 Physiol Behav. 2022 May 1; 248:113726. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113726. Epub 2022 Feb 3"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-11-2024