Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractHighly selective conversion of CO(2) to methanol on the CuZnO-ZrO(2) solid solution with the assistance of plasma    Next Abstract"Binding, distribution, and plant uptake of mercury in a soil from Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA" »

Anal Methods


Title:Fusion of a low-cost electronic nose and Fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopy for qualitative and quantitative detection of beef adulterated with duck
Author(s):Han F; Huang X; Aheto JH; Zhang X; Rashed MMA;
Address:"School of Biological and Food Engineering, Suzhou University, Bianhe Middle Road 49, Suzhou 234000, Anhui, P. R. China. hanfk11@163.com. School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Xuefu Road 301, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, P. R. China"
Journal Title:Anal Methods
Year:2022
Volume:20220127
Issue:4
Page Number:417 - 426
DOI: 10.1039/d1ay01949j
ISSN/ISBN:1759-9679 (Electronic) 1759-9660 (Linking)
Abstract:"A low-cost electronic nose (E-nose) based on colorimetric sensors fused with Fourier transform-near-infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy was proposed as a rapid and convenient technique for detecting beef adulterated with duck. The total volatile basic nitrogen, protein, fat, total sugar and ash contents were measured to investigate the differences of basic properties between raw beef and duck; GC-MS was employed to analyze the difference of the volatile organic compounds emitted from these two types of meat. For variable selection and spectra denoising, the simple T-test (p < 0.05) separately intergraded with first derivative, second derivative, centralization, standard normal variate transform, and multivariate scattering correction were performed and the results compared. Extreme learning machine models were built to identify the adulterated beef and predict the adulteration levels. Results showed that for recognizing the independent samples of raw beef, beef-duck mixtures, and raw duck, FT-NIR offered a 100% identification rate, which was superior to the E-nose (83.33%) created herein. In terms of predicting adulteration levels, the root means square error (RMSE) and the correlation coefficient (r) for independent meat samples using FT-NIR were 0.511% and 0.913, respectively. At the same time, for E-nose, these two indicators were 1.28% and 0.841, respectively. When the E-nose and FT-NIR data were fused, the RMSE decreased to 0.166%, and the r improved to 0.972. All the results indicated that fusion of the low-cost E-nose and FT-NIR could be employed for rapid and convenient testing of beef adulterated with duck"
Keywords:"Animals Cattle *Ducks *Electronic Nose Fourier Analysis Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared/methods Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared/methods;"
Notes:"MedlineHan, Fangkai Huang, Xingyi Aheto, Joshua H Zhang, Xiaorui Rashed, Marwan M A eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2022/01/12 Anal Methods. 2022 Jan 27; 14(4):417-426. doi: 10.1039/d1ay01949j"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-11-2024