Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Treatment with algae extracts promotes flocculation, and enhances growth and neutral lipid content in Nannochloropsis oculata--a candidate for biofuel production"    Next AbstractSheep skin odor improves trap captures of mosquito vectors of Rift Valley fever »

Evolution


Title:Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection
Author(s):Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A;
Address:"Theoretical Biology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Universitatstrasse 16, CH-8092, Zurich, Switzerland; CoMPLEX, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; The Galton Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Environment, and Evolution, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. samuel.tazzyman@env.ethz.ch"
Journal Title:Evolution
Year:2014
Volume:20130930
Issue:1
Page Number:216 - 229
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12255
ISSN/ISBN:1558-5646 (Electronic) 0014-3820 (Print) 0014-3820 (Linking)
Abstract:"Why are there so few small secondary sexual characters? Theoretical models predict that sexual selection should lead to reduction as often as exaggeration, and yet we mainly associate secondary sexual ornaments with exaggerated features such as the peacock's tail. We review the literature on mate choice experiments for evidence of reduced sexual traits. This shows that reduced ornamentation is effectively impossible in certain types of ornamental traits (behavioral, pheromonal, or color-based traits, and morphological ornaments for which the natural selection optimum is no trait), but that there are many examples of morphological traits that would permit reduction. Yet small sexual traits are very rarely seen. We analyze a simple mathematical model of Fisher's runaway process (the null model for sexual selection). Our analysis shows that the imbalance cannot be wholly explained by larger ornaments being less costly than smaller ornaments, nor by preferences for larger ornaments being less costly than preferences for smaller ornaments. Instead, we suggest that asymmetry in signaling efficacy limits runaway to trait exaggeration"
Keywords:"Animals *Evolution, Molecular *Mating Preference, Animal *Models, Genetic Selection, Genetic *Sex Characteristics *Signal Detection, Psychological Fisher's runaway mate choice mate preference sexual dimorphism sexual ornament sexual selection;"
Notes:"MedlineTazzyman, Samuel J Iwasa, Yoh Pomiankowski, Andrew eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2013/10/09 Evolution. 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. doi: 10.1111/evo.12255. Epub 2013 Sep 30"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024