Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"One template, two outcomes: How does the sex-shared nervous system generate sex-specific behaviors?"    Next AbstractUltraconserved elements-based systematics reveals evolutionary patterns of host-plant family shifts and phytophagy within the predominantly parasitoid braconid wasp subfamily Doryctinae »

Ann Bot


Title:Variability in floral scent in rewarding and deceptive orchids: the signature of pollinator-imposed selection?
Author(s):Salzmann CC; Nardella AM; Cozzolino S; Schiestl FP;
Address:"Plant Ecological Genetics, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland"
Journal Title:Ann Bot
Year:2007
Volume:20070806
Issue:4
Page Number:757 - 765
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm161
ISSN/ISBN:0305-7364 (Print) 1095-8290 (Electronic) 0305-7364 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A comparative investigation was made of floral scent variation in the closely related, food-rewarding Anacamptis coriophora and the food-deceptive Anacamptis morio in order to identify patterns of variability of odour compounds in the two species and their role in pollinator attraction/avoidance learning. METHODS: Scent was collected from plants in natural populations and samples were analysed via quantitative gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Combined gas chromatography and electroantennographic detection was used to identify compounds that are detected by the pollinators. Experimental reduction of scent variability was performed in the field with plots of A. morio plants supplemented with a uniform amount of anisaldehyde. KEY RESULTS: Both orchid species emitted complex odour bouquets. In A. coriophora the two main benzenoid compounds, hydroquinone dimethyl ether (1,4-dimethoxybenzene) and anisaldehyde (methoxybenzaldehyde), triggered electrophysiological responses in olfactory neurons of honey-bee and bumble-bee workers. The scent of A. morio, however, was too weak to elicit any electrophysiological responses. The overall variation in scent was significantly lower in the rewarding A. coriophora than in the deceptive A. morio, suggesting pollinator avoidance-learning selecting for high variation in the deceptive species. A. morio flowers supplemented with non-variable scent in plot experiments, however, did not show significantly reduced pollination success. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas in the rewarding A. coriophora stabilizing selection imposed by floral constancy of the pollinators may reduce scent variability, in the deceptive A. morio the emitted scent seems to be too weak to be detected by pollinators and thus its high variability may result from relaxed selection on this floral trait"
Keywords:Animals Bees/physiology Feeding Behavior Flowers/chemistry Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry *Odorants Orchidaceae/*chemistry *Pollination;
Notes:"MedlineSalzmann, Charlotte C Nardella, Antonio M Cozzolino, Salvatore Schiestl, Florian P eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2007/08/09 Ann Bot. 2007 Oct; 100(4):757-65. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm161. Epub 2007 Aug 6"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024