| Title: | A Review of Suggested Mechanisms of MHC Odor Signaling |
| Address: | "Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plon, Germany" |
| ISSN/ISBN: | 2079-7737 (Print) 2079-7737 (Electronic) 2079-7737 (Linking) |
| Abstract: | "Although an individual's mix of MHC immune genes determines its resistance, finding MHC-dependent mate choice occurred by accident in inbred mice. Inbred mice prefer MHC dissimilar mates, even when the choice was restricted to urine. It took decades to find the info-chemicals, which have to be as polymorphic as the MHC. Microbiota were suggested repeatedly as the origin of the odor signal though germ-free mice maintained normal preference. Different versions of the 'carrier hypothesis' suggested MHC molecules carry volatiles after the bound peptide is released. Theory predicted an optimal individual MHC diversity to maximize resistance. The optimally complementary mate should be and is preferred as several studies show. Thus, the odor signal needs to transmit the exact information of the sender's MHC alleles, as do MHC ligand peptides but not microbiota. The 'MHC peptide hypothesis' assumes that olfactory perception of the peptide ligand provides information about the MHC protein in a key-lock fashion. Olfactory neurons react only to the anchors of synthesized MHC peptides, which reflect the binding MHC molecule's identity. Synthesized peptides supplemented to a male's signal affect choice in the predicted way, however, not when anchors are mutated. Also, the human brain detects smelled synthesized self-peptides as such. After mate choice, the lottery of meiosis of randomly paired oocyte and sperm haplotypes would often produce MHC non-optimal offspring. In sticklebacks, eggs select MHC-compatible sperm, thus prefer the best combination close to the population optimum" |
| Keywords: | haplotype choice major histocompatibility complex mate choice microbiota olfaction optimal MHC perception signaling; |
| Notes: | "PubMed-not-MEDLINEMilinski, Manfred eng Review Switzerland 2022/08/27 Biology (Basel). 2022 Aug 7; 11(8):1187. doi: 10.3390/biology11081187" |
