Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractStructure-activity relationships in C-terminal fragment analogs of pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide in Helicoverpa zea    Next AbstractQueen reproductive state modulates pheromone production and queen-worker interactions in honeybees »

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg


Title:Surgical smoke: still an underestimated health hazard in the operating theatre
Author(s):Kocher GJ; Sesia SB; Lopez-Hilfiker F; Schmid RA;
Address:"Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Tofwerk AG, Thun, Switzerland"
Journal Title:Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
Year:2019
Volume:55
Issue:4
Page Number:626 - 631
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy356
ISSN/ISBN:1873-734X (Electronic) 1010-7940 (Linking)
Abstract:"OBJECTIVES: Smoke generated from electrocautery dissection contains irritating and/or carcinogenic components. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a mobile smoke evacuation system (SES) in protecting surgical personnel from these hazardous fumes. METHODS: Standardized cuts with an electrocautery device were performed on fresh porcine tissue, and the generated surgical fume was analysed with and without the additional use of a mobile SES using a real-time proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Furthermore, 2 different surgical masks were tested to investigate their filter capacity. RESULTS: Several toxic and/or carcinogenic volatile organic compounds including 1,3-butadiene, benzene and furfural were found in concentrations clearly above the limits that were set by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health: 1,3-butadiene at 19.06 +/- 1.54 ppm (limit: 5 ppm), benzene at 6.21 +/- 1.33 ppm (limit: 0.5 ppm) and furfural at 14.34 +/- 2.97 ppm (limit: 2 ppm). Although the mobile SES was able to reduce these substances to a certain degree, butadiene and benzene still remained above the permissible exposure limits with concentrations of 14.21 +/- 0.07 and 1.16 +/- 0.05, respectively. Both surgical masks were unable to reduce the 'inhaled' concentrations of volatile organic compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Although the SES reduced the concentrations of most of the detected volatile organic compounds to a certain amount, especially the carcinogenic substances, butadiene and benzene remained high above exposure limits. According to the abovementioned significant data, further investigation on this topic is imperative, especially when considering that surgical masks were absolutely ineffective in protecting individuals from the toxic smoke and that the cautery was only used for 10 s in this experiment"
Keywords:"Air Filters Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects/analysis/*prevention & control Animals Electrocoagulation/adverse effects Humans Masks Maximum Allowable Concentration *Operating Rooms Smoke/*adverse effects/analysis/prevention & control Swine Volatile O;"
Notes:"MedlineKocher, Gregor J Sesia, Sergio B Lopez-Hilfiker, Felipe Schmid, Ralph A eng Germany 2018/11/06 Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Apr 1; 55(4):626-631. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy356"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024