Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractReinvestigation of sex pheromone biosynthesis in the moth Trichoplusiani reveals novel quantitative control mechanisms    Next AbstractPhytochemicals as population sampling lures »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Some Factors Influencing Calling Behavior and Mass Emission Rate of Sex Pheromone from the Gland of the Moth Chloridea virescens
Author(s):Foster SP; Anderson KG;
Address:"Entomology Department, School of Natural Resource Management, North Dakota State University, NDSU Dept 7650, PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA. stephen.foster@ndsu.edu. Entomology Department, School of Natural Resource Management, North Dakota State University, NDSU Dept 7650, PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2022
Volume:20211125
Issue:2
Page Number:141 - 151
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-021-01334-2
ISSN/ISBN:1573-1561 (Electronic) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"To attract a mate, females of most moth species synthesize and emit sex pheromone from a specific gland in a behavior termed 'calling'. In a broad temporal sense, calling behavior and pheromone synthesis are synchronized through the overlap of their circadian rhythms. However, the limited amount of pheromone a female produces each day must be managed so that pheromone is emitted at a sufficient (to attract males) mass emission rate (MER) over the entire calling period, typically many hours. We are studying pheromone synthesis and emission in the moth Chloridea (formerly Heliothis) virescens (family Noctuidae). One way that female C. virescens manage pheromone over their calling period is by calling intermittently; the period between calling bouts allows females to replenish pheromone, and resume calling at high MERs. However, militating against replenishment is loss of pheromone through putative catabolism. In this paper, we examined three aspects pertaining to pheromone MER in C. virescens: (i) the effect of adult feeding on calling behavior, (ii) the effect of certain behavioral/physical parameters on MER, and (iii) the relative loss (putative catabolism) of pheromone in retracted (non-calling) and everted (calling) glands. We found that (i) adult feeding increases calling duration, consistent with the known concomitant increase in pheromone production, (ii) various physical factors relating to the gland, including degree of eversion (surface area), orientation to airstream, and air velocity over the gland influence MER, and (iii) putative catabolism occurs in both retracted and everted glands, but substantially less pheromone is lost in the everted gland primarily because of the high MER when the gland is first everted. Together, these data demonstrate that, over the calling period, the efficient use of pheromone for emission by female C. virescens is dependent on the interaction among synthesis, storage, catabolism, and calling behavior"
Keywords:"Animals Female Male *Moths/metabolism Pheromones/metabolism Secondary Metabolism *Sex Attractants/metabolism Sexual Behavior, Animal Catabolism Chemical communication Exocrine gland Lepidoptera Pheromone biosynthesis;"
Notes:"MedlineFoster, Stephen P Anderson, Karin G eng 2021/11/26 J Chem Ecol. 2022 Feb; 48(2):141-151. doi: 10.1007/s10886-021-01334-2. Epub 2021 Nov 25"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024