Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstractp115 Rho GTPase activating protein interacts with MEKK1    Next AbstractTwo conjugation systems associated with Streptococcus faecalis plasmid pCF10: identification of a conjugative transposon that transfers between S. faecalis and Bacillus subtilis »

J Breath Res


Title:A systematic review of breath analysis and detection of volatile organic compounds in COPD
Author(s):Christiansen A; Davidsen JR; Titlestad I; Vestbo J; Baumbach J;
Address:"Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Research Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark"
Journal Title:J Breath Res
Year:2016
Volume:20160831
Issue:3
Page Number:34002 -
DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/3/034002
ISSN/ISBN:1752-7163 (Electronic) 1752-7155 (Linking)
Abstract:"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is, according to the WHO, the fifth leading cause of death worldwide, and is expected to increase to rank third in 2030. Few robust biomarkers for COPD exist, and several attempts have been made to find suitable molecular marker candidates. One rising research area is breath analysis, with several published attempts to find exhaled compounds as diagnostic markers. The field is broad and no review of published COPD breath analysis studies exists yet. We have conducted a systematic review examining the state of art and identified 12 suitable papers, which we investigated in detail to extract a list of potential COPD breath marker molecules. First, we observed that no candidate markers were detected in all 12 studies. Only three were reported in more than one paper, thus reliable exhaled markers are still missing. A major challenge is the heterogeneity in breath sampling technologies, the selection of appropriate control groups, and a lack of sophisticated (and standardized) statistical data analysis methods. No cross-hospital/study comparisons have been published yet. We conclude that future efforts should (also) concentrate on making breath data analysis more comparable through standardization of sampling, data processing, and reporting"
Keywords:"Biomarkers/analysis Breath Tests/*methods Exhalation Humans Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/*diagnosis ROC Curve Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis;"
Notes:"MedlineChristiansen, Anders Davidsen, Jesper Romhild Titlestad, Ingrid Vestbo, Jorgen Baumbach, Jan eng Meta-Analysis Review Systematic Review England 2016/09/01 J Breath Res. 2016 Aug 31; 10(3):034002. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/3/034002"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 23-09-2024