Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEstimating insect flight densities from attractive trap catches and flight height distributions    Next AbstractAttraction of the Euwallacea sp. near fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to Quercivorol and to Infestations in Avocado »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Modeling and regression analysis of semiochemical dose-response curves of insect antennal reception and behavior
Author(s):Byers JA;
Address:"US Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, Maricopa, AZ 85138, USA. john.byers@ars.usda.gov"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2013
Volume:20130730
Issue:8
Page Number:1081 - 1089
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-013-0328-6
ISSN/ISBN:1573-1561 (Electronic) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"Dose-response curves of the effects of semiochemicals on neurophysiology and behavior are reported in many articles in insect chemical ecology. Most curves are shown in figures representing points connected by straight lines, in which the x-axis has order of magnitude increases in dosage vs. responses on the y-axis. The lack of regression curves indicates that the nature of the dose-response relationship is not well understood. Thus, a computer model was developed to simulate a flux of various numbers of pheromone molecules (10(3) to 5 x 10(6)) passing by 10(4) receptors distributed among 10(6) positions along an insect antenna. Each receptor was depolarized by at least one strike by a molecule, and subsequent strikes had no additional effect. The simulations showed that with an increase in pheromone release rate, the antennal response would increase in a convex fashion and not in a logarithmic relation as suggested previously. Non-linear regression showed that a family of kinetic formation functions fit the simulated data nearly perfectly (R(2) >0.999). This is reasonable because olfactory receptors have proteins that bind to the pheromone molecule and are expected to exhibit enzyme kinetics. Over 90 dose-response relationships reported in the literature of electroantennographic and behavioral bioassays in the laboratory and field were analyzed by the logarithmic and kinetic formation functions. This analysis showed that in 95% of the cases, the kinetic functions explained the relationships better than the logarithmic (mean of about 20% better). The kinetic curves become sigmoid when graphed on a log scale on the x-axis. Dose-catch relationships in the field are similar to dose-EAR (effective attraction radius, in which a spherical radius indicates the trapping effect of a lure) and the circular EARc in two dimensions used in mass trapping models. The use of kinetic formation functions for dose-response curves of attractants, and kinetic decay curves for inhibitors, will allow more accurate predictions of insect catch in monitoring and control programs"
Keywords:"Animals Arthropod Antennae/metabolism/physiology Behavior, Animal/*drug effects Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Insecta/physiology Kinetics *Models, Biological Pheromones/*pharmacology Receptors, Odorant/metabolism Regression Analysis;"
Notes:"MedlineByers, John A eng 2013/07/31 J Chem Ecol. 2013 Aug; 39(8):1081-9. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0328-6. Epub 2013 Jul 30"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-09-2024