Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractChanges in concentration levels of selected VOCs in newly erected and remodelled building in Gdansk    Next AbstractComparative Study of the Restorative Effects of Forest and Urban Videos during COVID-19 Lockdown: Intrinsic and Benchmark Values »

Behav Processes


Title:"Multimodal communication, mismatched messages and the effects of turbidity on the antipredator behavior of the Barton Springs salamander, Eurycea sosorum"
Author(s):Zabierek KC; Gabor CR;
Address:"Department of Biology, Population and Conservation Biology Program, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA. Department of Biology, Population and Conservation Biology Program, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA. Electronic address: gabor@txstate.edu"
Journal Title:Behav Processes
Year:2016
Volume:20160628
Issue:
Page Number:4 - 10
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.016
ISSN/ISBN:1872-8308 (Electronic) 0376-6357 (Linking)
Abstract:"Prey may use multiple sensory channels to detect predators, whose cues may differ in altered sensory environments, such as turbid conditions. Depending on the environment, prey may use cues in an additive/complementary manner or in a compensatory manner. First, to determine whether the purely aquatic Barton Springs salamander, Eurycea sosorum, show an antipredator response to visual cues, we examined their activity when exposed to either visual cues of a predatory fish (Lepomis cyanellus) or a non-predatory fish (Etheostoma lepidum). Salamanders decreased activity in response to predator visual cues only. Then, we examined the antipredator response of these salamanders to all matched and mismatched combinations of chemical and visual cues of the same predatory and non-predatory fish in clear and low turbidity conditions. Salamanders decreased activity in response to predator chemical cues matched with predator visual cues or mismatched with non-predator visual cues. Salamanders also increased latency to first move to predator chemical cues mismatched with non-predator visual cues. Salamanders decreased activity and increased latency to first move more in clear as opposed to turbid conditions in all treatment combinations. Our results indicate that salamanders under all conditions and treatments preferentially rely on chemical cues to determine antipredator behavior, although visual cues are potentially utilized in conjunction for latency to first move. Our results also have potential conservation implications, as decreased antipredator behavior was seen in turbid conditions. These results reveal complexity of antipredator behavior in response to multiple cues under different environmental conditions, which is especially important when considering endangered species"
Keywords:*Animal Communication Animals *Cues Fishes Nephelometry and Turbidimetry Pheromones/*analysis Photic Stimulation *Predatory Behavior Urodela/*physiology *Visual Perception Amphibian Chemical cue Darter Sensory compensation Sunfish Visual cue;
Notes:"MedlineZabierek, Kristina C Gabor, Caitlin R eng Netherlands 2016/07/03 Behav Processes. 2016 Sep; 130:4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 28"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024