Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDiagnostic accuracy of breath tests for pneumoconiosis using an electronic nose    Next AbstractBreath biopsy of breast cancer using sensor array signals and machine learning analysis »

Biosensors (Basel)


Title:Accuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Author(s):Yang HY; Chen WC; Tsai RC;
Address:"Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10055, Taiwan. Department of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Public Health, Taipei 10055, Taiwan. Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 10002, Taiwan. Department of Family Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50006, Taiwan"
Journal Title:Biosensors (Basel)
Year:2021
Volume:20211122
Issue:11
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.3390/bios11110469
ISSN/ISBN:2079-6374 (Electronic) 2079-6374 (Linking)
Abstract:"(1) Background: An electronic nose applies a sensor array to detect volatile biomarkers in exhaled breath to diagnose diseases. The overall diagnostic accuracy remains unknown. The objective of this review was to provide an estimate of the diagnostic accuracy of sensor-based breath tests for the diagnosis of diseases. (2) Methods: We searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases for studies published between 1 January 2010 and 14 October 2021. The search was limited to human studies published in the English language. Clinical trials were not included in this review. (3) Results: Of the 2418 records identified, 44 publications were eligible, and 5728 patients were included in the final analyses. The pooled sensitivity was 90.0% (95% CI, 86.3-92.8%, I(2) = 47.7%), the specificity was 88.4% (95% CI, 87.1-89.5%, I(2) = 81.4%), and the pooled area under the curve was 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95). (4) Conclusion: The findings of our review suggest that a standardized report of diagnostic accuracy and a report of the accuracy in a test set are needed. Sensor array systems of electronic noses have the potential for noninvasiveness at the point-of-care in hospitals. Nevertheless, the procedure for reporting the accuracy of a diagnostic test must be standardized"
Keywords:Biomarkers *Breath Tests *Electronic Nose Humans Sensitivity and Specificity breath test breathomics electronic nose sensors volatile organic compound;
Notes:"MedlineYang, Hsiao-Yu Chen, Wan-Chin Tsai, Rodger-Chen eng MOST 109-2314-B-388 002-166-MY3/Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan/ NTU-110L881004/National Taiwan University/ Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Switzerland 2021/11/26 Biosensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 22; 11(11):469. doi: 10.3390/bios11110469"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024