Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEngineered quorum sensing using pheromone-mediated cell-to-cell communication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae    Next AbstractContaminated land clean-up using composted wastes and impacts of VOCs on land »

J Econ Entomol


Title:"Evaluation of Nasonov Pheromone Dispensers for Pollinator Attraction in Apple, Blueberry, and Cherry"
Author(s):Williamson J; Adams CG; Isaacs R; Gut LJ;
Address:"Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2018
Volume:111
Issue:4
Page Number:1658 - 1663
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toy107
ISSN/ISBN:1938-291X (Electronic) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"Declines in the number of commercial honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and some wild bee species around the world threaten fruit, nut, and vegetable production and have prompted interest in developing methods for gaining efficiencies in pollination services. One possible approach would be to deploy attractants within the target crop to increase the number of floral visits. In this study, we evaluate two new pollinator attractants, Polynate and SPLAT Bloom, for their ability to increase pollinator visitation and fruit set in apple (Malus pumila Mill.), highbush blueberry (Vaccinium sp. L.), and tart cherry (Prunus cerasus L.). Polynate is a plastic twin-tube dispenser loaded with a mixture of floral scent and Nasonov pheromone. SPLAT Bloom contains the same chemical formula as Polynate, but is applied as a 3 g wax dollop directly onto the tree or bush. The objectives of this study were to determine if Polynate and SPLAT Bloom increase the number of honey bee foragers and fruit set in apples, highbush blueberries, and tart cherries. We conducted replicated evaluations of 32 fields or orchards with and without putative attractants over three growing seasons. Both products failed to provide a measurable increase in pollinator visits or fruit set in these crops, indicating no return on investment for either product"
Keywords:Animals Bees *Blueberry Plants Fruit *Malus Pheromones Pollination *Prunus avium Nasonov pheromone attractants honey bee;
Notes:"MedlineWilliamson, J Adams, C G Isaacs, R Gut, L J eng England 2018/04/25 J Econ Entomol. 2018 Aug 3; 111(4):1658-1663. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy107"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024