Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractBreath biopsy for early detection and precision medicine in cancer    Next AbstractAltered exhaled biomarker profiles in children during and after rhinovirus-induced wheeze »

J Breath Res


Title:Effect of transportation and storage using sorbent tubes of exhaled breath samples on diagnostic accuracy of electronic nose analysis
Author(s):van der Schee MP; Fens N; Brinkman P; Bos LD; Angelo MD; Nijsen TM; Raabe R; Knobel HH; Vink TJ; Sterk PJ;
Address:"Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.p.vanderschee@amc.uva.nl"
Journal Title:J Breath Res
Year:2013
Volume:20121221
Issue:1
Page Number:16002 -
DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/7/1/016002
ISSN/ISBN:1752-7163 (Electronic) 1752-7155 (Linking)
Abstract:"Many (multi-centre) breath-analysis studies require transport and storage of samples. We aimed to test the effect of transportation and storage using sorbent tubes of exhaled breath samples for diagnostic accuracy of eNose and GC-MS analysis. As a reference standard for diagnostic accuracy, breath samples of asthmatic patients and healthy controls were analysed by three eNose devices. Samples were analysed by GC-MS and eNose after 1, 7 and 14 days of transportation and storage using sorbent tubes. The diagnostic accuracy for eNose and GC-MS after storage was compared to the reference standard. As a validation, the stability was assessed of 15 compounds known to be related to asthma, abundant in breath or related to sampling and analysis. The reference test discriminated asthma and healthy controls with a median AUC (range) of 0.77 (0.72-0.76). Similar accuracies were achieved at t1 (AUC eNose 0.78; GC-MS 0.84), t7 (AUC eNose 0.76; GC-MS 0.79) and t14 (AUC eNose 0.83; GC-MS 0.84). The GC-MS analysis of compounds showed an adequate stability for all 15 compounds during the 14 day period. Short-term transportation and storage using sorbent tubes of breath samples does not influence the diagnostic accuracy for discrimination between asthma and health by eNose and GC-MS"
Keywords:Adult Asthma/metabolism Breath Tests/*instrumentation Case-Control Studies Cross-Sectional Studies Exhalation Female Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Humans Male Middle Aged *Specimen Handling/instrumentation Volatile Organic Compounds/metabolism;
Notes:"Medlinevan der Schee, M P Fens, N Brinkman, P Bos, L D J Angelo, M D Nijsen, T M E Raabe, R Knobel, H H Vink, T J Sterk, P J eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2012/12/22 J Breath Res. 2013 Mar; 7(1):016002. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/7/1/016002. Epub 2012 Dec 21"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024