Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Antagonism between jasmonate- and salicylate-mediated induced plant resistance: effects of concentration and timing of elicitation on defense-related proteins, herbivore, and pathogen performance in tomato"    Next AbstractEvolution of jasmonate and salicylate signal crosstalk »

Oecologia


Title:Cross-talk between jasmonate and salicylate plant defense pathways: effects on several plant parasites
Author(s):Thaler JS; Karban R; Ullman DE; Boege K; Bostock RM;
Address:"Department of Botany, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks St., Toronto, M5 S 3B2, Canada. thaler@botany.utoronto.ca. Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA"
Journal Title:Oecologia
Year:2002
Volume:20020401
Issue:2
Page Number:227 - 235
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0885-9
ISSN/ISBN:1432-1939 (Electronic) 0029-8549 (Linking)
Abstract:"Plants are often attacked by many herbivorous insects and pathogens at the same time. Two important suites of responses to attack are mediated by plant hormones, jasmonate and salicylate, which independently provide resistance to herbivorous insects and pathogens, respectively. Several lines of evidence suggest that there is negative cross-talk between the jasmonate and salicylate response pathways. This biochemical link between general plant defense strategies means that deploying defenses against one attacker can positively or negatively affect other attackers. In this study, we tested for cross-talk in the jasmonate and salicylate signaling pathways in a wild tomato and examined the effects of cross-talk on an array of herbivores of cultivated tomato plants. In the wild cultivar, induction of defenses signaled by salicylate reduced biochemical expression of the jasmonate pathway but did not influence performance of S. exigua caterpillars. This indicates that the signal interaction is not a result of agricultural selection. In cultivated tomato, biochemical attenuation of the activity of a defense protein (polyphenol oxidase) in dual-elicited plants resulted in increased of performance of cabbage looper caterpillars, but not thrips, spider mites, hornworm caterpillars or the bacteria Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. In addition, we tested the effects of jasmonate-induced resistance on the ability of thrips to vector tomato spotted wilt virus. Although thrips fed less on induced plants, this did not affect the level of disease. Thus, the negative interaction between jasmonate and salicylate signaling had biological consequences for two lepidopteran larvae but not for several other herbivores tested or on the spread of a disease"
Keywords:Cross-talk Herbivory Induced defense Jasmonate Salicylate;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEThaler, Jennifer S Karban, Richard Ullman, Diane E Boege, Karina Bostock, Richard M eng Germany 2002/04/01 Oecologia. 2002 Apr; 131(2):227-235. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0885-9. Epub 2002 Apr 1"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-07-2024