Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDepression and panic attacks related to phenol-formaldehyde composite material exposure in an aerospace manufacturing plant    Next Abstract"Olfactory attractants for West African tsetse flies, glossina spp. (Diptera: Glossinidae)" »

Environ Sci Technol


Title:Life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of biochar implementation in conservation agriculture in Zambia
Author(s):Sparrevik M; Field JL; Martinsen V; Breedveld GD; Cornelissen G;
Address:"Norwegian Geotechnical Institute NGI, Oslo, Norway. magnus.sparrevik@ngi.no"
Journal Title:Environ Sci Technol
Year:2013
Volume:20130116
Issue:3
Page Number:1206 - 1215
DOI: 10.1021/es302720k
ISSN/ISBN:1520-5851 (Electronic) 0013-936X (Linking)
Abstract:"Biochar amendment to soil is a potential technology for carbon storage and climate change mitigation. It may, in addition, be a valuable soil fertility enhancer for agricultural purposes in sandy and/or weathered soils. A life cycle assessment including ecological, health and resource impacts has been conducted for field sites in Zambia to evaluate the overall impacts of biochar for agricultural use. The life cycle impacts from conservation farming using cultivation growth basins and precision fertilization with and without biochar addition were in the present study compared to conventional agricultural methods. Three different biochar production methods were evaluated: traditional earth-mound kilns, improved retort kilns, and micro top-lit updraft (TLUD) gasifier stoves. The results confirm that the use of biochar in conservation farming is beneficial for climate change mitigation purposes. However, when including health impacts from particle emissions originating from biochar production, conservation farming plus biochar from earth-mound kilns generally results in a larger negative effect over the whole life cycle than conservation farming without biochar addition. The use of cleaner technologies such as retort kilns or TLUDs can overcome this problem, mainly because fewer particles and less volatile organic compounds, methane and carbon monoxide are emitted. These results emphasize the need for a holistic view on biochar use in agricultural systems. Of special importance is the biochar production technique which has to be evaluated from both environmental/climate, health and social perspectives"
Keywords:"Agriculture/*methods Charcoal/*chemistry *Conservation of Natural Resources Crops, Agricultural/growth & development *Environment Geography Zambia Zea mays/growth & development;"
Notes:"MedlineSparrevik, Magnus Field, John L Martinsen, Vegard Breedveld, Gijs D Cornelissen, Gerard eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2013/01/01 Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Feb 5; 47(3):1206-15. doi: 10.1021/es302720k. Epub 2013 Jan 16"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024