Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCommensal bacteria play a role in mating preference of Drosophila melanogaster    Next AbstractA comprehensive screen for volatile organic compounds in biological fluids »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Evaluation of preventive treatments in low-density gypsy moth populations using pheromone traps
Author(s):Sharov AA; Leonard D; Liebhold AM; Clemens NS;
Address:"Department of Entomology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. sharov@vt.edu"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2002
Volume:95
Issue:6
Page Number:1205 - 1215
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-95.6.1205
ISSN/ISBN:0022-0493 (Print) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"Pheromone traps can be used for evaluating the success of treatments that are applied to either eradicate or delay the growth of isolated low-density populations of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.). We developed an index of treatment success, T, that measures the reduction in moth counts in the block treated adjusted by the change in moth counts in the reference area around it. This index was used to analyze the effectiveness of treatments that were conducted as part of the USDA Forest Service Slow-the-Spread of the gypsy moth project from 1993 to 2001. Out of 556 treatments that were applied during this period, 266 (188,064 ha) were selected for the analysis based on several criteria. They included 173 blocks treated with Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) variety kurstaki and 93 blocks treated with racemic disparlure. Analysis using general linear models indicated that disparlure treatments were significantly more effective than B. thuringiensis treatments in reducing moth captures. The frequency of repeated treatments in the same area was higher after B. thuringiensis than after disparlure applications. Treatments were more successful if the pretreatment moth counts outside of the block treated were low compared with moth counts inside the block"
Keywords:"Animals Bacillus thuringiensis Insect Control/*methods Moths/*physiology Pest Control, Biological *Pheromones Population Density United States;"
Notes:"MedlineSharov, Alexei A Leonard, Donna Liebhold, Andrew M Clemens, Nicholas S eng Comparative Study Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2003/01/24 J Econ Entomol. 2002 Dec; 95(6):1205-15. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-95.6.1205"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024