Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractThe effect of blood signals on aggressive behaviour in mice    Next AbstractAsymmetrical generalisation between pheromonal and floral odours in appetitive olfactory conditioning of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) »

Plants (Basel)


Title:The Joint Evolution of Herbivory Defense and Mating System in Plants: A Simulation Approach
Author(s):Sandoval-Castellanos E; Nunez-Farfan J;
Address:"Laboratorio de Genetica Ecologica y Evolucion, Departamento de Ecologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecologia, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City 04510, Mexico. Population Genomics Group, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 82152 Munich, Germany"
Journal Title:Plants (Basel)
Year:2023
Volume:20230126
Issue:3
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.3390/plants12030555
ISSN/ISBN:2223-7747 (Print) 2223-7747 (Electronic) 2223-7747 (Linking)
Abstract:"Agricultural losses brought about by insect herbivores can be reduced by understanding the strategies that plants use against insect herbivores. The two main strategies that plants use against herbivory are resistance and tolerance. They are, however, predicted to be mutually exclusive, yet numerous populations have them both (hence a mixed defense strategy). This has been explained, among other alternatives, by the non-linear behavior of the costs and benefits of resistance and tolerance and their interaction with plants' mating system. Here, we studied how non-linearity and mating system affect the evolutionary stability of mixed defense strategies by means of agent-based model simulations. The simulations work on a novel model that was built upon previous ones. It incorporates resistance and tolerance costs and benefits, inbreeding depression, and a continuously scalable non-linearity. The factors that promoted the evolutionary stability of mixed defense strategies include a multiplicative allocation of costs and benefits of resistance and tolerance, a concave non-linearity, non-heritable selfing, and high tolerance costs. We also found new mechanisms, enabled by the mating system, that are worth considering for empirical studies. One was a double trade-off between resistance and tolerance, predicted as a consequence of costs duplication and the inducibility of tolerance, and the other was named the resistance-cost-of-selfing, a term coined by us, and was derived from the duplication of costs that homozygous individuals conveyed when a single resistance allele provided full protection"
Keywords:agent-based model simulations coevolution gene-for-gene model herbivory inbreeding mating system resistance selfing tolerance;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINESandoval-Castellanos, Edson Nunez-Farfan, Juan eng 81490/Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia/ 01/Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico UNAM/ Switzerland 2023/02/12 Plants (Basel). 2023 Jan 26; 12(3):555. doi: 10.3390/plants12030555"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024